Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision

Abstract

Human foveal vision is subserved initially by groups of spatial, temporal and orientational ‘filters’, the outputs of which are combined to define perceptual objects. Although a great deal is known about the filtering properties of individual cortical cells, relatively little is known about the nature of this ‘linking’ process. One recent approach1 has shown that the process can be thought of in terms of an association field whose strength is determined conjointly by the orientation and distance of the object. Here we describe a fundamental difference in this feature-linking process in central and peripheral parts of the visual field, which provides insight into the ways that foveal and peripheral visual perception differ2,3. In the fovea, performance can be explained only by intercellular linking operations whereas in the periphery intracellular filtering will suffice. This difference represents a substantial economy in cortical neuronal processing of peripheral visual information and may allow a recent theory of intercellular binding to be tested4,5,6,7.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: An example of the path stimuli used.
Figure 2: The simple-filter model.
Figure 3: Detection of paths embedded in a background field of randomly oriented elements.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Field, D. J., Hayes, A. & Hess, R. F. Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local “association field”. Vision Res. 33, 173–193 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aubert, H. & Foerster, E. Unter suchungen über raumsinn der retina. Albrecht v. Graefes Arch. Opthalmol. 3, 1–37 (1857).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schneider, G. E. Two visual systems. Science 163, 895–902 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. von der Malsburg, C. in Synergetics of the Brain (ed. Basar, E., Flohr, H., Haken, H. & Mandall, A. J.) 238–249 (Springer, Berlin, (1983)).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. von der Malsburg, C. & Singer, W. in Neurobiology of Neocortex (eds Rakic, P. & Singer, W.) 69–99 (Wiley, Chichester, (1988)).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kreiter, A. K. & Singer, W. Global stimulus arrangement determines synchronization of neuronal activity in the awake macaque monkey. Eur. J. Neurosci. (suppl.) 7, 153 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engel, A. K., Konig, P., Kreiter, A. K., Schillen, T. B. & Singer, W. Temporal coding in the visual cortex: new vistas on integration in the nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 15, 218–226 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Watt, R. J. & Morgan, M. J. Atheory of the primitive spatial code in human vision. Vis. Res. 25, 1661–1674 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y., Thibos, L. N. & Bradley, A. Undersampling produces non-veridical motion perception, but not necessarily motion reversal, in peripheral vision. Vision Res. 36, 1737–1744 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert, C. D. & Wiesel, T. N. Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 9, 2432–2442 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tso, D. Y. & Gilbert, C. D. The organization of chromatic and spatial interactions in the primate striate cortex. J. Neurosci. 8, 1712–1727 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips, G. & Wilson, H. Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 226–232 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Watt, R. J. Understanding Vision (Academic, London, (1991)).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Canadian MRC (MT 10818).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert F. Hess.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hess, R., Dakin, S. Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision. Nature 390, 602–604 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/37593

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/37593

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing