Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants

Abstract

HERMAPHRODITISM comprises outcrossing whenever the proximity of male and female organs allows self-fertilization1 and interference between sexual functions2. Many floral traits of animal-pollinated angiosperms encourage cross-fertilization3, as recognized by Darwin4-6; however, these characteristics may also allow pollination between flowers on the same individual (geitonogamous self-pollination) 7,8. Simultaneous display of many flowers exemplifies this conflict. Although large floral displays promote outcrossing through enhanced pollinator attraction9, they could be costly in terms of lost mating opportunities10,11 if geitonogamy decreased outcrossed siring success by reducing pollen transfer between plants (pollen discounting12). We report here that, after manipulating the flower number of bee-pollinated Eichhornia paniculata plants, we observed the predicted higher selfing and lower outcrossed siring success for larger inflorescences. Given the reduced fitness resulting when pollen receipt by one flower interferes with pollen export by another, we propose broadening traditional interpretations of floral design and display to recognize their roles in reducing geitonogamous pollen discounting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jarne, P. & Charlesworth, D. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 441–446 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lloyd, D. G. & Webb, C. J. New Zeal. J. Bot. 24, 135–162 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Richards, A. J. Plant Breeding Systems (Allen and Unwin, London, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Darwin, C. R. The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom (Murray, London, 1876).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Darwin, C. R. The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species (Murray, London, 1877).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Darwin, C. R. The Various Contrivances by Which Orchids are Fertilised by Insects 2nd edn (Murray, London, 1877).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barrett, S. C. H., Harder, L. D. & Cole, W. W. Funct. Ecol. 8, 526–535 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Jong, T. J., Waser, N. M. & Klinkhamer, P. G. L. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 321–325 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., de Jong, T. J. & de Bruyn, G-J. Oikos 54, 201–204 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth B. Evolution 41, 948–968 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lloyd, D. G. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 153, 370–380 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holsinger, K. E., Feldman, M. W. & Christiansen, F. B. Am. Nat. 124, 446–453 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barrett, S. C. H. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 25, 41–60 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crawford, T. J. in Evolutionary Ecology (ed Shorrocks, B) 135–173 (Blackwell Scientific, London, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holsinger, K. E. & Thomson, J. D. Am. Nat. 144, 799–812 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harder, L. D. & Barrett, S. C. H. in Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants (eds Lloyd, D. G. & Barrett, S. C. H.) (Chapman and Hall, New York, in the press).

  17. Fisher, R. A. Ann. Eugenics 11, 53–63 (1941).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagylaki, T. J. theor. Biol. 58, 55–58 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Holsinger, K. E. in Ecology and Evolution of Plant Reproduction (ed. Wyatt, R.) 169–191 (Chapman and Hall, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kohn, J. R. & Barrett, S. C. H. Evolution (in the press).

  21. Rausher, M. D., Augustine, D. & VanderKooi, A. Evolution 47, 1688–1695 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ritland, K. Am. Nat. 138, 1049–1057 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Klinkhamer, P. G. L. & de Jong, T. J. Oikos 66, 180–184 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bertin, R. I. Am. J. Bot. 80, 557–560 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lloyd, D. G. & Webb, C. J. in Evolution and Function of Heterostyly (ed. Barrett, S. C. H.) 179–207 (Springer, Berlin, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Kirk, R. E. Experimental Design 2nd edn (Brooks/Cole, Belmont, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Neter, J., Wasserman, W. & Kutner, M. H. Applied Linear Statistical Models 3rd edn (Irwin, Homewood, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ritland, K. J. Hered. 81, 235–237 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harder, L., Barrett, S. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373, 512–515 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/373512a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/373512a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing