Main

After the discovery of the CFTR gene 15 years ago, a detailed understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms whereby CFTR mutation leads to inflammatory lung disease remains elusive. Specific aberrations, which have been identified, include a deficiency of cAMP-activated chloride permeability, abnormal binding and internalization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and altered terminal glycosylation of surface and secreted glycoproteins. A growing body of evidence suggests that CFTR mutations also leads to an ERK kinase-mediated, ER overload response, which reprograms epithelial cell gene expression, which could predispose to an exaggerated proinflammatory cytokine response in the lungs of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. In addition, class I mutations that result in the production of nonfunctional CFTR protein have also been shown to cause aberrant inflammatory responses, characterized by increased levels of TNFα, KC, mip2 and infective inflammatory responses toward Pseudomonas bacterial clearance.1 Ineffective and excessive inflammatory response to invading microbes in the CF airways seem to go beyond the effects of the CF mutation on the epithelial–bacterial interaction. This is evidenced by the data from CF infants, who despite having any detectable infection still produce elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines.2 It is further supported by the similar findings in patients with mild pulmonary symptoms that show signs of excessive inflammation.3, 4

This concept closely fits the progressive neutrophil-mediated airway damage seen in CF. The latter phenomenon has been recapitulated to some extent in the CFTR knockout mouse, although this model requires that agarose beads be used as a delivery vehicle for Pseudomonas in order to establish reproducible persistence of bacteria in the lower airways. Once this is established, however, there is a clear divergence between CF and normal mice, with CF mice demonstrating greater mortality, weight loss and lung inflammation.5

Another inflammatory phenotype that is quite peculiar to CF patients is a hyper-IgE syndrome known as allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), a syndrome characterized by an IgE antibody response specific for Aspergillus fumigatus (Af), a total serum IgE level of greater than 5000 ng/ml and clinical signs of allergic airway hyper-reactivity. ABPA is quite common in CF patients (10–15% affected)6, 7 and very rare outside of CF. One report has indicated that even among those individuals who have ABPA without overt CF, approximately 50% will have one identifiable CFTR mutation.8 Animal model studies of ABPA have mainly focused on the use of C57BL/6 and Balb/c mice and respective cytokine knockouts in these genetic backgrounds.9, 10, 11 No animal studies have been conducted to mimic this peculiar allergic state in the genetic context of a CFTR knockout mouse. Despite the similarities in asthmatic ABPA and CF ABPA, the two also show differences in pathology and, more interestingly, in prevalence; this complicates the translation of the previous animal model results to CF and ABPA. Given the close connection between CFTR mutation and ABPA, we sought to determine whether CFTR knockout mice (CFTR S489X(−/−); fatty acid binding protein (FABP)-hCFTR-gut corrected)12 were more prone to ABPA than normal mice, when sensitized with Af antigen and challenged via the airway. The observed hyper-IgE phenotype could potentially serve as both a means to study pathogenic mechanism in CF lung disease and a model for studying the effect of new therapies in this disorder.

Materials and methods

Mouse Strains

The primary CFTR knockout strain used for these studies was the CFTR S489X(−/−) neo insertion in C57BL/6 mice developed initially at the University of North Carolina,13 and then modified with the transgenic overexpression of gut-specific expression of human CFTR from the FABP promoter in order to prevent intestinal obstruction and improve viability.12 These mice demonstrate the same lung phenotype as the original mice.5 Age- and sex-matched C57BL/6 mice were used as control mice for all experiments. Since some FVB/NJ genetic background remains in the CFTR S489X(−/−); FABP-hCFTR(+/+) mice, FVB/NJ mice were also used as control mice.

In addition, CFTR S489X(−/−); FABP-hCFTR(+/+) mice were backcrossed one more time to wild-type C57BL/6/mCFTR(+/+) mice to produce CFTR S489X(−/+); FABP-hCFTR(+/+) mice. These mice were then crossed to generate F2 offspring littermates. The F2 littermates were genotyped, F2 CFTR S489X(+/+); FABP-hCFTR(+), F2 CFTR S489X(−/+); FABP-hCFTR(+) and F2 CFTR S489X(−/−); FABP-hCFTR(+), and were chosen for use in experiments analyzing IgE levels after sensitization and challenge with Af.

Aspergillus Sensitization and Challenge

CFTR S489X(−/−); FABP-hCFTR(+/+), C57BL/6J and FVB/NJ mice (5–6 weeks old) were housed in the SPF mouse colony of the University of Florida according to NIH guidelines and were allowed food and water ad libitum. All experimental procedures were approved by the IACUC of the University of Florida. Animals were sensitized to Af crude protein extract (Af-cpe) (Greer Laboratories). Briefly, animals were administered with intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of 200 μg of Af-cpe extract dissolved in 100 μl of PBS on days 0 and 14. Aerosol challenge was performed with 0.25% Af-cpe for 20 min in a 30 × 30 × 20 cm acrylic chamber using a jet nebulizer Pari model LC-D with an air flow of 6 l/min on days 28, 29 and 30. Nonsensitized control mice received i.p. injections with PBS alone and were challenged with Af-cpe along with sensitized mice.

Serum IgE Levels

Blood was collected on day 32 after killing the mice, centrifuged in a serum separator and stored at −80°C until analysis. Total IgE levels were measured with the BD OptEIA ELISA (BD biosciences), and triplicate sera samples were used for each mouse. Tetramethyl-benzidine substrate was used to develop the assay and was read at 450 nm with correction at 570 nm on the VersaMax Micro Plate Reader (Molecular Devices).

Af antigen-specific ELISA was performed by coating a 96-well plates with 10 μg of Af-cpe (Greer Laboratories) and detected using BD OptEIA IgE ELISA (BD biosciences) detection antibody. For the Af antigen-specific standard, the mouse serum from a high IgE responder was serially diluted starting at a 1:15 dilution. This relative standard was used to create a standard curve and its units were termed Ufs/ml, with the 1:15 dilution being 333 Ufs/ml.

Serum IgG Isotype Levels

Blood was collected on day 32 after killing the mice, centrifuged in a serum separator and stored at −80°C until analysis. Samples were assayed on the Bioplex Suspension Array system (Biorad) using the Beadlyte Mouse Immunoglobulin Isotyping Kit (Upstate) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were diluted 1:25 000.

Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) for Cell Counts and Cytokine Levels

BAL fluid was retrieved from each animal via cannulation of the exposed trachea and gentle flushing of the lungs with two 1 ml aliquots of PBS. Aliquots were pooled for individual animals preceding centrifugation and separation of pelleted cells and supernatant. Cytospin preparations of BAL cells were stained using Hema-3 (Biochemical Sciences, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) differential stain and relative cell populations were determined using standard morphological criteria.

Cytokine Determination

Assessments of cytokine profiles from the BAL were performed using a commercially available multiplexed kit (Biorad Mouse Multi-Cytokine Detection System; Biorad Laboratories) and the Bioplex Suspension Array System. Simultaneous measurement of five cytokines was performed: specifically IL-1β, IL-2, IL-5, GM-CSF and IL-10. All assays were performed according to the manufacturer's protocols. Cytokine concentrations were determined utilizing Bioplex software with four-parameter data analysis. The sensitivity of the assay is less than 10 pg/ml and has a range from 0.2 to 32 000 pg/ml with an inter- and intra-assay CV of less than 10%.

Lung Histology

Immediately after collection of lavage fluid, one of the lobes was tied off, and ice-cold freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde in 1 × PBS (pH 7.4) was instilled through the tracheal cannula to one of the two lobes to inflation-fix the lung. Specimens were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C overnight and dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions. Tissue was embedded in paraffin. Sections were cut at 5 μm thickness and mounted. For determination of inflammatory cells and goblet cell hyperplasia, PAS- and B220-stained slides were semiquantitatively scored in a blinded manner.

Lung mRNA Extraction and Real-Time PCR

RNA isolation, RT-PCR and real-time PCR—Total RNA was isolated from lung tissue as per the Chomczynski and Sacchi method with modifications.14 cDNA was produced from 1 μg of Total RNA using the Superscript First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen cat. # 11904-018). The resultant cDNA was diluted 1:5 with sterile water for the subsequent real-time PCR. Real-time PCR was carried out in a 25 μl reaction volume containing 2 μl of diluted cDNA template, a final concentration of 1 × SYBR Green Master Mix (ABI cat. # 4309155) and 300 nM each of forward and reverse primer. Reactions were carried out in ABI Prism 96-well optical reaction plates with 96-well optical covers (Applied Biosystems). Amplification was conducted using an ABI Sequence Detection System 7000 (SDS 7000) and consisted of an initial hold for 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of melting at 95°C for 15 s and annealing/extension at 60°C for 1 min. Amplification was determined automatically by the SDS 7000 instrument, and reported as a cycling threshold (CT). Relative fold changes were determined using the ΔΔCT method, where the cyclophilin A gene has been used for normalization.15

Statistical Analysis

All data were compared using an unequal variance two-tailed Student's t-test, unless stated otherwise. Data were considered statistically significant when P≤0.05.

Results

Sensitization-Specific Allergen-Induced Airway Inflammation

In an attempt to model the peculiar airway inflammation phenotype of ABPA, CFTR−/− and C57Bl/6, mice were sensitized and challenged with Af-cpe. At 48 h after the final aerosol Af-cpe challenge, lung tissue samples were obtained from the PBS- and Af-sensitized mice to assess the degree of inflammatory cell infiltration and goblet cell hyperplasia. In order to control for nonspecific effects of Af antigen, we compared experimental animals with mice, which have been mock sensitized with PBS injection and then challenged with the same dose of Af antigen. This latter group had no observable airway inflammation. In contrast, the Af-sensitized animals of both strains had a greater degree of mucous cell (Goblet cell) hyperplasia (Figure 1). Further histological analysis showed airway edema and alveolar inflammation only in Af-sensitized animals; however (Table 1), there were no demonstrable differences between strains in any of these indices, nor were there systematic strain differences in mast cell and B-cell (B220 staining) numbers (Figure 2).

Figure 1
figure 1

Representative PAS-stained whole-lung sections (× 10) from Af-challenged mice at day 32. C57BL/6 (a) and CFTR−/− (b) mice were sensitized with 200 μg of Af crude extract and C57BL/6 (c) and CFTR−/− (d) mice were PBS mock sensitized on days 1 and 14. Inset pictures are (× 20) representative sections showing mucous cell hyperplasia.

Table 1 Analysis of lung tissue from CFTR−/− and C57BL/6 mice post-Af crude protein extract challenges
Figure 2
figure 2

Representative B220-stained whole lung sections (ad) from Af-challenged mice and Hema-3-stained BAL infiltrates (e, f) at day 32. (a) CFTR−/− Af-sensitized, (b) CFTR−/− PBS-sensitized, (c) C57Bl/6 Af-sensitized and (d) C57Bl/6 PBS-sensitized mice. (e) Cytospin of the BAL from an Af-sensitized C57Bl/6. (f) Cytospin of the BAL from an Af-sensitized CFTR−/−. For quantitative analysis of BAL composition refer to Table 2.

Hyper-IgE Response to Af in CF Mice

The hallmark of ABPA in CF patients and the one parameter used for screening patients is the serum IgE level. In order to determine whether CF mice exhibited an analogous response to Af antigen, we compared serum IgE levels after Af-cpe sensitization and airway challenge with those seen in controls from comparable strain backgrounds and with other cohorts of unsensitized animals after acute Af antigen exposure (Figure 3). Total serum IgE levels in the Af-sensitized CF mice were extraordinarily high, reaching means of over 36 000 ng/ml, approximately fivefold greater than either the unsensitized CF controls or the sensitized non-CF controls. Interestingly, the ‘baseline’ levels of IgE in the CF mice (after the series of PBS ‘sensitization’ injections) were approximately equal to those seen in C57BL/6 mice, possibly indicating a predilection for IgE responsiveness in the CFTR−/− mice to environmental or nutritional factors even in the absence of repeated Af sensitization. In agreement with the high total serum IgE levels, Af-sensitized mice also show an overwhelmingly higher Af antigen-specific IgE response. The levels of Af-specific IgE antibodies were again fivefold higher in CF mice than in FVB mice. Strikingly, the difference is even more pronounced (20-fold) when comparing CF mice to C57BL/6 (Figure 4).

Figure 3
figure 3

Total serum IgE levels in PBS-control or Af-sensitized CFTR−/− (on a hybrid mostly C57BL/6, partial FVB background), C57BL/6 and FVB/NJ mice. CFTR−/− (n=7), C57BL/6 (n=7) and FVB/NJ (n=7) were sensitized with 200 μg of Af crude extract dissolved in 200 μl of PBS on days 1 and 14. Control mice for each strain (n=7) were mock sensitized with 200 μl PBS. Blood samples were collected on day 32, 48 h after the third aerosol Af challenge. Total serum IgE in the Af-sensitized (▒) and PBS-control sensitized (▪) mice were measured by ELISA. Mean±s.e.m. (N=7).

Figure 4
figure 4

Af-specific serum IgE levels in Af-sensitized CFTR, C57BL/6 and FVB/NJ mice. CFTR−/− (n=7), C57BL/6 (n=7) and FVB/NJ (n=7) were sensitized with 200 μg of Af crude extract dissolved in 200 μl of PBS on days 1 and 14. Serum IgE specific for Af crude extract was detected by coating the ELISA plate with 10 μg of Af protein extract. Results are reported as Ufs/ml (arbitrary units) created by serial dilution of a high IgE responder. Mean±s.e.m. (N=7).

Mouse strain background can have a profound effect on these responses, and the CF mouse strain used here is not on a pure C57BL/6 background. Therefore, we sought to further characterize the CFTR mutation's effects on total serum IgE levels by comparing mCFTR(−/−) mice with matched mCFTR(+/+) and heterozygous littermate controls. To accomplish this, we backcrossed the CFTR S489X(−/−); FABP-hCFTR(+/+) mice to C57BL/6, and then bred the resulting hybrid heterozygote offspring to each other to generate F2 hybrids. Litters from the F2 generation therefore included mCFTR(−/−), mCFTR(+/−) and mCFTR(+/+) animals with the remainder of the background being of a consistent hybrid mixture. These experiments show a twofold increase in the levels of serum IgE levels from homozygous CFTR mutants when compared to mice homozygous for wild-type CFTR (Figure 5). The data also showed a strong trend toward a gene–dose response, with CFTR heterozygotes showing an intermediate level of total serum IgE when compared to mCFTR(+/+) and mCFTR(−/−) mice. It must be noted that all levels were significantly lower than those seen in the F0, which may indicate that strain background may play a partial role in determining total IgE levels as well.

Figure 5
figure 5

Total serum IgE levels in littermate controls. CFTR−/− were backcrossed to C57BL/6 to create F1 mCFTR(+/−) FABPhCFTR(+). The F1 mice were bred to each other to create F2 hybrid background mice that were mCFTR(+/+), mCFTR(+/−) and mCFTR(−/−). All mice were FABPhCFTR(+), either homozygous or heterozygous for the latter transgene. All mice were sensitized with 200 μg of Af crude extract on days 1 and 14. Blood samples were collected on day 32, 48 h after the third aerosol Af challenge. Total serum IgE was measured by ELISA. Results are reported as group means±s.e.m. (N=8).

To further characterize the hyperpolarized Th2 response, we looked at other antibody isotypes that respond to the effects of IL-4. Accordingly, the total serum IgG1 levels were twofold higher in the CF-sensitized mice, providing evidence for an IL-4 hyperpolarized response in these mice consistent with clinical reports of CF-ABPA patients. Interestingly, IgG2b levels, which do not respond to IL-4 but rather to TGF-B16 and IgM levels were higher in non-CF controls (Figure 6). Finally, as seen in ABPA, IgG3 levels did not differ significantly among groups (data not shown).

Figure 6
figure 6

Total serum IgG subclass pattern in CF and non-CF mice sensitized to Af. Total serum (a) IgG1, (b) IgG2b and (c) IgM were measured in the Af-sensitized (▒) and PBS-control sensitized (▪) mice using a multiplex bead assay on day 32, 48 h after the last challenge. Mean±s.e.m. (N=7).

BAL Cell and Cytokine Profiles

Mouse sensitization models of asthma generally follow either an IL-4-predominant or an IL-5-predominant phenotype depending upon the strain background.17 A previous report indicated that the CFTR−/− mouse strain had upregulation of IL-4 expression, which also coincides with a high IgE level.18 In accordance with this initial finding in the CFTR mouse, recently Knutsen et al19 reported that ABPA CF patients have an increased sensitivity to IL-4 when compared to non-ABPA CF patients. This increased sensitivity resulted in a skewing of Th2T cells in ABPA CF patients. In order to test our working hypothesis that our CFTR−/− Af-sensitized mice were exhibiting a similarly skewed IL-4-like response, we examined cell profiles and cytokine levels in the BAL of CFTR−/− and control mice both at their baseline (PBS sensitized) and after Af sensitization (Table 2).

Table 2 Proportions of inflammatory cells in the BAL

As demonstrated in Table 2, the CFTR−/− mice had a slight increase in BAL eosinophils at their baseline when compared to the C57BL/6 controls, and postsensitization exhibited a mixed cellular response. The C57BL/6 mice exhibited the expected macrophage predominance at baseline and a more completely eosinophilic response after Af sensitization and challenge. This pattern is completely consistent with the known predisposition of C57BL/6 mice to mount an IL-5-predominant response, while the CFTR−/− mice more closely mimicked the IL-4-predominant pathway.

Further direct confirmation of this phenotypic difference was provided by the measurement of BAL cytokine levels (Figure 7). As shown in Figure 6, the BAL IL-5 and BAL GM-CSF levels, two cytokines involved in the maturation recruitment and maintenance of eosinophils,20 were dramatically higher in the C57BL/6 mice than in the CFTR−/− mice, directly indicating an IL-5-predominant response in the former and an IL-4-biased response in the latter. Interestingly, IL-2 levels were also higher in the CFTR−/− mice, possibly indicating a more complex Th1/Th2 response. The dramatic differences in serum IgE levels, BAL cell count and BAL cytokine responses occurred despite ample histological evidence of airway and parenchymal inflammation in both strains argues for a qualitative different cytokine gene expression response rather than a simply quantitative difference in the degree of exposure and responsiveness.

Figure 7
figure 7

Effects of Af crude extract aerosol challenge on the cytokine levels in the BALs. (a) IL-5 BAL, (b) GM-CSF and (c) IL-2 BAL levels in PBS- (▒) and Af- (▪) sensitized mice. Results are expressed as means±s.e.m. (N=7).

Cytokine Gene Expression Differences between CFTR−/− and Control Mice

In order to confirm that phenotypic differences were due to the postulated differences in gene expression between the two strains, mRNA was analyzed from total lung extracts after Af-cpe challenge in all four groups (CFTR−/− Af sensitized, CFTR−/− PBS injected, C57BL/6 Af sensitized, C57BL/6 PBS injected) (Figure 8). As indicated in the figure, CFTR−/− mice demonstrated modest increases in IL-4 (twofold at baseline) and IL-2 (sevenfold after sensitization), and more dramatic increases in the chemokine KC (fourfold at baseline, 16-fold post-Af-cpe challenge) and particularly in IL-13 (twofold at baseline, >280-fold post-Af). These changes parallel both the predilection for exaggerated IL-8-like chemokine responses seen in human CF patients infected with P. aeruginosa and the IL-4/IL-13-predominant asthma-like response that is seen in ABPA.

Figure 8
figure 8

Effects of Af aerosol challenge on lung cytokine mRNA levels in PBS- and Af-sensitized mice. All mRNA levels are normalized as fold inductions over levels in the PBS-sensitized C57BL/6 mice. (a) Cytokines with less that 20-fold induction. (b) IL-4 and (c) IL-13 cytokine with highest induction levels. Relative fold changes were determined using the ΔΔCT method, where the cyclophilin A gene has been used for normalization. Data are represented as group means and error bars are s.d. (N=7).

Discussion

The paucity of simple models of CF lung disease presents a limitation, both in studies of basic mechanisms of lung inflammation in CF and in studies of potential therapies. While a number of models of P. aeruginosa airway infection have been developed in CFTR knockout mice, each of these still presents some limitations.

In this report, we have taken an alternative approach, modeling a distinctly different inflammatory condition to which CF patients are uniquely susceptible. The observations presented here indicate that CFTR knockout mice do, indeed, demonstrate a qualitatively different response to Af antigen upon airway challenge, mimicking in many ways the hyper-IgE syndrome of ABPA.

The concept that cytokine gene regulation is aberrant in CF is far from novel. A range of studies dating back to the early 1980s have indicated that lung inflammation in CF may be exaggerated.21, 22, 23, 24 Early studies indicated that anti-inflammatory corticosteroids may have benefits in CF lung disease generally, albeit with an unacceptable level of side effects, and steroid therapy remains standard of care in CF patients with ABPA. Other anti-inflammatory agents, such as ibuprofen, also have efficacy in CF lung disease. Studies from both CF cell lines and from the CFTR knockout mice indicate a predilection for higher levels of expression of certain proinflammatory cytokine genes either at baseline or after infection with Pseudomonas. A growing body of evidence also supports the notion that CFTR-related inflammation may actually precede infection.2 Recent studies suggest that the changes in inflammation caused by CF may be an inherent feature of immune cells involved in the inflammatory process as well as lung epithelial and submucosal gland serous cells.25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 Finally, gene expression studies in the CFTR knockout mice have clearly indicated an upregulation of many genes, including IL-4,18 which likely forms the basis for the observations in the current study. In mice, total serum IgE and IgG1 are definitely correlated with IL-4 production and a Th2-predominant response, so that our findings should have been predicted based on those studies.

The most striking feature of our model is the total IgE level itself, which is dramatically higher in Af-sensitized CFTR knockout mice than in any other strain for which there is published data without the use of adjuvant. This feature in and of itself along with the Af-specific IgE levels mimics the clinical condition. In fact, a very large proportion of CF patients have anti-Af IgE and IgG antibodies, but only those with ABPA demonstrate total IgE levels greater than 10 000 ng/ml. The total serum IgE level, therefore, stands as the standard screening assay for this condition. In addition to the hyper-IgE response, Nikolaaizik et al31 has reported increased levels in IgG1 and IgG4 levels in CF ABPA patients when compared to non-ABPA CF controls. Thus, to further characterize the Th2 B-cell response, we looked at specific IgG isotypes. Whereas in humans, IgG4-like IgE is IL-4 responsive, in mice IL-4 drives the isotype switching of IgE and IgG1.32 Accordingly, accompanying the increase in IgE levels was the typical IL-4 antibody-driven response, which included higher levels of IgG1 antibodies in the sera of Af-sensitized CFTR knockout mice.

The exaggerated Th2-induced response that is observed in the CFTR knockout mice is probably driven by the higher basal levels of IL-4 and IL-13 that were observed in our studies. The particularly robust and heightened induction of IL-13 in CF mice compared to the control mice is interesting, especially in the light of the recent report by Hauber et al,33 in which he observes higher levels of IL-13 in the peripheral blood monocytes of CF patients. Interestingly, mRNA gene expression analysis also demonstrated a higher IL-2 and IFN-gamma response in the CFTR−/− Af-sensitized mice. Moreover, BAL samples from CF patients with ABPA demonstrate usually a mixed inflammatory pattern composed of a more complex Th1/Th2 lymphocyte response showing increased levels of IL-2 and IFN-gamma along with IL-4 and IL-5.34 This mixed Th1/Th2 response is more evident in the CFTR−/− mice showing higher levels of IL-2 and IFN-gamma along with IL-4 and IL-13 cytokines mimicking what is seen in the clinical setting. In addition to the upregulation of Th1/Th2 cytokines, there was also a fourfold increase in the levels of the chemokine KC. KC is the murine counterpart of the human growth-related protein alpha (IL-8 family). The effects of KC in neutrophil trafficking and in response to Pseudomonas have been well documented.5, 35 Interestingly, this chemokine has been recently shown to induce a strong bronchial hyper-reactivity in an ovalbumin allergic mouse model via the upregulation of leukotrienes.36 In the same study, KC was also observed to act as a bridge between the innate and adaptive immune not only by serving as a chemoattractant but also by inducing the transcription of IL-13 mRNA in the lungs, which in turn amplifies the expression of KC . This positive feedback regulation may help perpetuate and amplify the hyper-allergic phenomena observed in the CFTR knockout mice.

The murine model described here is unique in that the absence or dysfunction of the CFTR protein and its implications on the inflammatory response to inhaled allergen has not been described to date. While one might argue as to the relative importance of ABPA vs Pseudomonas infection in terms of global impact in this disease, the peculiar nature of this condition in CF suggests that it might provide some clues as to the cytokine aberrations that underlie both of these inflammatory lung phenotypes.