Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Co-evolution of ligand-receptor pairs

Abstract

SPECIFIC receptors for lutropin1,2 (luteinizing hormone; LH) and follitropin3,4 (follicle-stimulating hormone; FSH) mediate the actions of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and FSH5 on the gonads. Here we report that short independent sequences of the β-subunit enable hCG to distinguish between the receptors for FSH and LH. Residues between the 11lth and 12th cysteines restrict FSH receptor binding; residues between the 10th and 11th cysteines and, to a much lesser extent, residues carboxy-terminal to the 11th cysteine also affect LH receptor binding. CF101–109, an hCG analogue containing hFSHβ residues between the 11th and 12th cysteines, had high affinity for both LH and FSH receptors. Modifications to CF101-109 that reduce binding to either LH or FSH receptors yield gonadotropin analogues having differing ratios of LH:FSH activity. Ligand-binding specificity of the LH receptor is determined by residues encoded by parts of exons 2–4 and 7–9 which prevent hFSH binding but have little effect on hCG binding. FSH receptor specificity is controlled primarily by residues encoded by exons 5 and 6 that prevent hCG binding but have little effect on hFSH binding. These determinants can be interchanged to create receptor analogues that bind hCG and hFSH. Our observations support a model in which distinct negative determinants restrict ligand-receptor interaction. This explains co-evolution of binding specificity in families of homologous ligands and their receptors. Natural or designed manipulation of these determinants leads to the 'evolution' of new, specific protein-protein interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Segaloff, D. L., Sprengel, R., Nikolics, G. & Ascoli, M. Rec. Prog. Horm. Res. 46, 261–301 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koo, Y. B., Ji, I., Slaughter, R. G. & Ji, T. H. Endocrinology 128, 2297–2308 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sprengel, R., Braun, T., Nikolics, K., Segaloff, D. L. & Seeburg, P. H. Molec. Endocr. 4, 525–530 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heckert, L. L., Daley, I. J. & Griswold, M. D. Molec. Endocr. 6, 70–80 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierce, J. G. & Parsons, T. F. A. Rev. Biochem. 50, 465–495 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Murphy, B. D. & Martinuk, S. D. Endocr. Rev. 12, 27–44 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Braun, T., Schofield, P. R. & Sprengel, R. EMBO J. 10, 1885–1890 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moyle, W. R., Bernard, M. P., Myers, R. V., Marko, O. M. & Strader, C. D. J. biol. Chem. 266, 10807–10812 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagayama, Y. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 902–905 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Licht, P. et al. Rec. Prog. Horm. Res. 33, 169–248 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Noce, T. et al. J. molec. Endocr. 3, 129–137 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiddes, J. C. & Talmadge, K. Rec. Prog. Horm. Res. 40, 43–78 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, J. et al. J. biol. Chem. 267, 16283–16287 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vilcek, J. & Lee, R. H. J. biol. Chem. 266, 7313–7316 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bewley, T. A. & Li, C. H. Adv. Enzym. 42, 73 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. VanOstade, X. et al. Nature 361, 206–207 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell, R. K., Dean Emig, D. M. & Moyle, W. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 760–764 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moyle, W. R., Ehrlich, P. H. & Canfield, R. E. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 2245–2249 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernard, M. P., Myers, R. V. & Moyle, W. R. Molec. cell. Endocr. 71, R19–R23 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brooker, J., Harper, J. F., Terasaki, W. L. & Moylan, R. D. Adv. Cyclic Nucleotide Res. 10, 1–33 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Munson, P. J. & Rodbard, D. Analyt. Biochem. 107, 220–239 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Xie, Y.-B., Wang, H. & Segaloff, D. L. J. biol. Chem. 265, 21411–21414 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moyle, W. R. et al. J. biol. Chem. 265, 8511–8518 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K. & Pease, L. R. Gene 77, 51–59 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moyle, W., Campbell, R., Myers, R. et al. Co-evolution of ligand-receptor pairs. Nature 368, 251–255 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/368251a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/368251a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing