Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition

Abstract

HOUSE mice (Mus musculus domesticus) form communal nests and appear to nurse each other's pups indiscriminately. Communal nesting probably functions to reduce infanticide1, but it also makes females vulnerable to exploitation if nursing partners fail to provide their fair share of care. Kinship theory predicts that females will preferentially form communal nests with relatives to minimize exploitation and further increase inclusive fitness2–4. Here we provide evidence from seminatural populations that females prefer communal nesting partners that share allelic forms of major histocompatibility complex genes. Such behaviour would lead to the selection of close relatives as communal nesting partners5–7. Although criteria for the demonstration of kin recognition are currently embroiled in controversy8,9, this is the first vertebrate study to meet Grafen's restrictive requirements8,10: discrimination is based on genetic similarity at highly polymorphic loci, incidental correlations due to relatedness are experimentally controlled, and strong reasons exist for expecting the assayed behaviour to be kin-selected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manning, C. J., Dewsbury, D. A., Wakeland, E. K. & Potts, W. K. Anim. Behav. (in the press)

  2. Hamilton, W. D. J. theor. Bio. 7, 1–52 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilkinson, G. S. & Baker, A. E. M. Ethology 77, 103–114 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Packer, C., Lewis, S. & Pusey, A. Anim. Behav. 43, 265–281 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Getz, W. M. J. theor. Bio. 92, 209–226 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beecher, M. D. Am Zool. 22, 477–490 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lacy, R. C. & Sherman, P. W. Am. Nat. 121, 489–512 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grafen, A. Anim. Behav. 39, 42–54 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnard, C. J., Hurst, J. L. & Aldous, P. Biol. Rev. 66, 377–430 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnard, C. Trends Ecol. Evol. 310, 312 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klein, J. Natural History of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (Wiley, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas, L. in Fourth International Convocation of Immunology (eds Neter, E. & Milgrom, F.) 2–11 (Karger, Basel, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, J. L. in Ethical Questions in Brain and Behavior (ed. Pfaff. D. W.) 111–124 (Springer, New York, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Grosberg, R. K. & Quinn, J. F. Nature 322, 456–459 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Partridge, L. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B319, 525–539 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Uyenoyama, M. K. in The Evolution of Sex (eds Michod, R. E. & Levin, B. R.) 212–232 (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Potts, W. K. & Wakeland, E. K. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5, 181–187 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Beauchamp, G. K., Yamazaki, K., Duncan, H., Bard, J. & Boyse, E. A. in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates V (eds MacDonald, D. W., Muller-Schwarze, D. & Natynczuk, S. E.) 244–254 (Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beauchamp, G. K., Yamazaki, K., Bard, J. & Boyse, E. A. Behav. Genet. 18, 537–547 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Egid, K. & Brown, J. L. Anim. Behav. 38, 548–549 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Potts, W. K., Manning, C. J. & Wakeland, E. K. Nature 352, 619–621 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Oka, H. in Profiles of Japanese Science and Scientists 1970 (ed. Yukawa, H.) 196–206 (Kodansha, Tokyo, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scofield, V. L., Schlumpberger, J. M., West, L. A. & Weissman, I. L. Nature 295, 499–502 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hurst, J. L. & Barnard, C. J. Behav. Ecol. 3, 196–206 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamazaki, K. et al. Science 240, 1331–1332 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manning, C., Wakeland, E. & Potts, W. Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature 360, 581–583 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/360581a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/360581a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing