Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Lekking in the black grouse— a test of male viability

Abstract

LEKS, where males congregate to display and females attend only to mate, present one of the most remarkable outcomes of sexual selection1. It is a common but untested belief that females mate with the most vigorous males2. In leks of the black grouse Tetrao tetrix, males dominant in winter flocks were most successful in mating, as were males winning fights over female dummies placed at territory boundaries. Males tear feathers from each others' tail ornaments in combats, and attractive males always had undamaged tails. We report here that by choosing victorious males, females mate with males that are most likely to survive the following six months. There is a strong association between female preference and male viability which supports a basic assumption of the 'good gene' models (refs. 3–9) where choosy females benefit through better viability of their offspring. But females may also be choosing viable males for immediate benefits2,10, in particular if diseases can be transmitted during copulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradbury, J. W. & Gibson, R. M. in Mate Choice (ed. Bateson, P. P. G.) 109–138 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, M. J. Nature 350, 33–38 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zahavi, A. J. theoret. Biol. 53, 205–214 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. Science 218, 384–387 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pomiankowski, A. N. Oxford Surv. evol. Biol. 5, 136–184 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grafen, A. J. theoret. Biol. 144, 473–516 (1990).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grafen, A. J. theoret. Biol. 144, 517–546 (1990).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A. & Nee, S. Evolution (in the press).

  9. Møller, A. P. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B243, 145–148 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reynolds, J. D. & Gross, M. R. Am. Nat. 136, 230–243 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Höglund, J., Alatalo, R. V. & Lundberg, A. Behaviour 114, 221–231 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alatalo, R. V., Höglund, J., Lundberg, A. & Sutherland, W. J. Behav. Ecol. (in the press).

  13. Koivisto, I. Finnish Game Res. 26, 1–60 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kruijt, J. P. & de Vos, G. J. in Reproductive Success (ed. Clutton-Brock, T. H.) 279–290 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kruijt, J. P., de Vos, G. J., & Bossema, I. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 15, 399–423 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Angelstam, P. Ornis Scand. 15, 123–134 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Willebrand, T. thesis, Uppsala Univ. (1988).

  18. Watt, W. B., Carter, P. A. & Donohue, K. Science 233, 1187–1190 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. von Schantz, T. et al. Nature 337, 166–169 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. von Schantz, T., Göransson, G., Fröberg, I., Helgee, A. & Witzell, H. Anim. Behav. 40, 89–104 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Partridge, L. Nature 283, 290–291 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor, C. E., Pereda, A. D. & Ferrari, J. A. Am. Nat. 129, 721–729 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alatalo, R., Höglund, J. & Lundberg, A. Lekking in the black grouse— a test of male viability. Nature 352, 155–156 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/352155a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/352155a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing