Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Extreme sexual dimorphism in a Miocene hominoid

Abstract

SOME Miocene hominoids may have been extremely sexually dimorphic for body size, inferred from the apparent dimorphism of dental and gnathic remains1–4. But this has never been demonstrated convincingly for any fossil species because of small sample sizes, uncertainties about the number of species in most fossil samples, and the inability to reliably sex individual specimens. Here we demonstrate a case of extreme dental dimorphism, and presumed body-size dimorphism, in a Miocene hominoid sample in which these limitations have been overcome. Lufengpithecus lufengensis from the late Miocene site of Lufeng, China, was more dimorphic than the most dimorphic living hominoid, the orangutan, and may have been more dimorphic than any living anthropoid.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kelley, J. J. hum. Evol. 15, 461–495 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kelley, J. & Pilbeam, D. in Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 1 (eds Swindler, D. R. & Erwin, J.) 361–411 (Liss, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pilbeam, D. Am. Anthrop. 88, 295–312 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pickford, M. Hum. Evol. 1, 111–148 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu, R., Xu, Q. & Lu, Q. Acta anthrop. Sinica 5, 1–30 (1986).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, Q., Lu, Q., Pan, Y., Zhang, X. & Zheng, L. Kexue Tongbao 9, 544–556 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, Q. & Lu, Q. Vert. Palasiat. 17, 1–13 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, R. & Oxnard, C. E. Nature 306, 286–260 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wu, R. & Oxnard, C. E. Am. J. Primatol. 5, 303–344 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelley, J. & Etler, D. Am. J. Primatol. 18, 15–34 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Plavcan, J. M. thesis, Duke Univ. (1990).

  12. Wu, R., Xu, Q. & Lu, Q. Acta anthrop. Sinica 2, 1–10 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kay, R. F. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 209–212 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, L. B. thesis, Univ. London (1983).

  15. Oxnard, C. E., Lieberman, S. S. & Gelvin, B. R. Am. J. Primatol. 8, 127–152 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Swindler, D. R. Dentition of Living Primates (Academic, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Swindler, D. R., McCoy, H. A. & Hornbeck, P. V. in The Baboon in Medical Research Vol. 2 (ed. Vagtbord, H.) 133–150 (University of Texas Press, Austin, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kelley, J. thesis, Yale Univ. (1986).

  19. Shea, B. T. Hum. Evol. 1, 97–110 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Demment, M. W. Afr. J. Ecol. 21, 219–233 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pickford, M. Hum. Evol. 1, 77–90 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jarman, P. Biol. Rev. 58, 485–520 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kay, R. F., Plavcan, J. M., Glander, K. E. & Wright, P. C. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 77, 385–397 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mahler, P. E. thesis, Univ. Michigan (1973).

  25. Post, D., Goldstein, S. & Melnick, D. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 49, 533–544 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leutenegger, W. & Cheverud, J. Int J. Primatol. 3, 387–402 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jungers, W. L. in Size and Scaling in Primate Biology (ed. Jungers, W. L.) 345–382 (Plenum, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fleagle, J. G. Primate Adaptation and Evolution (Academic New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Leutenegger, W. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 35, 91–100 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lucas, P. W., Corlett, R. T. & Luke, D. A. Z Morph. Anthrop. 76, 253–276 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fleagle, J. G. & Kitahara-Frisch, J. in The Lesser Apes (eds Preuschoft, H., Chivers, D. J., Brockelman, W. Y. & Creel, N.) 192–206 (Edinburgh University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pilbeam, D. Bull. Peabody Mus. nat. Hist. 31, 1–185 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wood, B. A. & Xu, Q. J. hum. Evol. 20, 291–311 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelley, J., Qinghua, X. Extreme sexual dimorphism in a Miocene hominoid. Nature 352, 151–153 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/352151a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/352151a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing