Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Haploidy or diploidy: which is better?

Abstract

ALTHOUGH the evolutionary advantages of sexual reproduction have been extensively discussed1–3, much less attention has been paid to haploid and diploid phases of the sexual life cycle. The relative lengths of these phases differ greatly in various taxa, including as extremes those with one or the other phase reduced to a single cell. Here we consider the efficiency of elimination of deleterious mutations as an evolutionary force and compare the mutation loads under haploid and diploid selection, Ln and L2n. With truncation-like selection, partial dominance, and heterozygous effect of a mutation less than about 1/4 its hemizygous effect, L2n < Ln ; otherwise L2n > Ln. The difference becomes important when the genomic deleterious mutation rate exceeds about 1 per genome. This suggests that the mutation rate, degree of dominance and mode of selection can be important in life-cycle evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Michod, R. E. & Levin, B. R. The Evolution of Sex (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachussetts, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kondrashov, A. S. Nature 334, 435–440 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Charlesworth, B. Genet. Res. 55, 199–221 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. Am. Nat. 99, 439–450 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haldane, J. B. S. Am. Nat. 71, 337–349 (1937).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crow, J. F. in Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics (ed. Kojima, K. I.) 128–177 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Kimura, M. Jap. J. Genet. 36S, 179–190 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Milkman, R. Genetics 88, 391–403 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 396–399 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crow, J. F. & Simmons, M. J. The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila Vol. 3c (ed. Ashburner, M., Carson, H. L. & Thompson, J. N.) 1–35 (Academic, London, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Efroimson, V. P. J. de Biologie 1, 87–102 (1932, in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karlin, S. & McGregor, J. Theor. Pop. Biol. 5, 59–103 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D. & Morgan, M. T. Nature 347, 380–382 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kondrashov, A., Crow, J. Haploidy or diploidy: which is better?. Nature 351, 314–315 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/351314a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/351314a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing