Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evidence from stellar abundances for a large age difference between two globular clusters

Nature volume 351, pages 212–214 (1991)Cite this article

Abstract

THE globular clusters NGC288 and NGC362 are central to recent claims1–1 of large age differences (∼3 Gyr) between globular clusters associated with our Galaxy. According to standard models for the formation of the Galaxy5, the system of globular clusters formed during the dynamical collapse of the protogalactic cloud, a process which should have lasted no more than 1 Gyr6. But the claimed age differences are derived from stellar evolution models using assumed CNO abundances, and uncertainty in the actual CNO abundances of about a factor of three could account for an apparent 2-Gyr age difference7,8. We have accurately measured abundances in red giants in NGC288 and NGC362, and find that the Fe abundance and the sum of the C, N and O abundances are essentially the same in every star studied. By eliminating compositional differences and thus confirming the reality of the age difference, these results imply a cluster formation period that is hard to reconcile with the standard collapse model5,6.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bolte, M. Astr. J. 97, 1688–1698 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Green, E. M. & Norris, J. E. Astrophys. J. 353, L17–L20 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. VandenBerg, D. A., Bolte, M. & Stetson, P. B. Astr. J. 100, 445–468 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarajedini, A. & Demarque, P. Astrophys. J. 365, 219–223 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eggen, O. J., Lynden-Bell, D. & Sandage, A. R. Astrophys. J. 136, 748–766 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. van Albada, T. S., Dickens, R. J. & Wevers, B. M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 196, 823–833 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rood, R. T. & Crocker, D. A. Proc. ESO Workshop on Production and Distribution of C, N, O Elements (eds Danziger, I. J., Matteuci, F. & Kjar, K.) 61–71 (ESO, Garching, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. VandenBerg, D. A. Proc. ESO Workshop on Production and Distribution of C, N, O Elements (eds Danziger, I. J, Matteuci, F. & Kjar, K.) 73–82 (ESO, Garching, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Searle, L. & Zinn, R. Astrophys. J. 225, 357–379 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tayler, R. J. Q. Jl R. astr. Soc. 27, 367–382 (1986).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. VandenBerg, D. A. Astr. Soc. Pacific Conf. Ser. 4, 187–200 (1988).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. King, C. R., Demarque, P. & Green, E. M. Calibration of Stellar Ages (ed. Philip, A. G. D.) 211–216 (Davis, Schenectady, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Demarque, P., Lee, Y.-W., Zinn, R. & Green, E. M. The Abundance Spread Within Globular Clusters: Spectroscopy of Individual Stars (eds Cayrel de Strobel, G., Spite, M. & Lloyd-Evans, T.) 97–103 (Paris Observatory, Paris, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rood, R. T. Astrophysical Ages and Dating Methods (eds Vangioni-Flam, E., Casse. M., Audouze, J. & Tran Thanh Van, J.) 313–322 (Editions Frontiers, Paris, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. VandenBerg, D. A. Astrophysical Ages and Dating Methods (eds Vangioni-Flam, E., Casse, M., Audouze, J. & Tran Thanh Van, J.) 241–258 (Editions Frontiers, Paris, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cannon, R. D. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 167, 551–580 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rood, R. T. & Crocker, D. A. IAU Colloq. No. 111, 103–119 (1989).

  18. Bell, R. A., Dickens, R. J. & Gustafsson, B. Astrophys. J. 229, 604–623 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luck, R. E. & Bond, H. E. Astrophys. J. 292, 559–577 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Caldwell, S. P. & Dickens, R. J. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 234, 87–94 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Deming, D. Astrophys. J. 222, 246–262 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sneden, C. Proc. ESO Workshop on Production and Distribution of C, N, O Elements (eds Danziger, I. J., Matteuci, F. & Kjar, K.) 1–19 (ESO, Garching, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Penny, A. J. & Dickens, R. J. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 220, 845–867 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, 0X11OQX, UK

    R. J. Dickens

  2. University of New South Wales, PO Box 1, Kensington, New South Wales, 2033, Australia

    B. F. W. Croke

  3. Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, New South Wales, 2121, Australia

    R. D. Cannon

  4. Astronomy Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742, USA

    R. A. Bell

Authors
  1. R. J. Dickens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. F. W. Croke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. D. Cannon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. A. Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickens, R., Croke, B., Cannon, R. et al. Evidence from stellar abundances for a large age difference between two globular clusters. Nature 351, 212–214 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/351212a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/351212a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing