Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state

Abstract

Determining how a protein folds is a central problem in structural biology. The rate of folding of many proteins is determined by the transition state, so that a knowledge of its structure is essential for understanding the protein folding reaction. Here we use mutation measurements—which determine the role of individual residues in stabilizing the transition state1,2—as restraints in a Monte Carlo sampling procedure to determine the ensemble of structures that make up the transition state. We apply this approach to the experimental data for the 98-residue protein acylphosphatase3, and obtain a transition-state ensemble with the native-state topology and an average root-mean-square deviation of 6 Å from the native structure. Although about 20 residues with small positional fluctuations form the structural core of this transition state, the native-like contact network of only three of these residues is sufficient to determine the overall fold of the protein. This result reveals how a nucleation mechanism involving a small number of key residues can lead to folding of a polypeptide chain to its unique native-state structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Native structure of acylphosphatase, AcP.
Figure 2: Comparison of φcalci with φexpi.
Figure 3: Properties of the transition-state ensemble, TSE, of AcP.
Figure 4: Representation of the TSE of AcP calculated with the improved model (see Methods).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matouschek, A., Kellis, J. T., Serrano, L. & Fersht, A. R. Mapping the transition state and pathway of protein folding by protein engineering. Nature 340, 122–126 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fersht, A. R. Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding (Freeman, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chiti, F. et al. Mutational analysis of acylphosphatase suggests the importance of topology and contact order in protein folding. Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 1005–1009 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Polanyi, J. C. & Zewail, A. H. Direct observation of the transition state. Acc. Chem. Res. 28, 119–132 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Winter, G., Fersht, A. R., Wilkinson, A. J., Zoller, M. & Smith, M. Redesigning enzyme structure by site-directed mutagenesis. Tyrosyl tRNA ATP binding. Nature 299, 756–758 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fersht, A. R., Leatherbarrow, R. J. & Wells, T. N. Structure-activity relationships in engineered proteins. Analysis of use of binding energy by linear free energy relationships. Biochemistry 26, 6030–6038 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wüthrich, K. Protein structure determination in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Science 243, 45–50 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Villegas, V., Martínez, J. C., Avilés, F. X. & Serrano, L. Structure of the transition state in the folding process of human procarboxypeptidase A2 activation domain. J. Mol. Biol. 283, 1027–1036 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuwajima, K. The molten globule state of α-lactalbumin. FASEB J. 10, 102–109 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Taddei, N. et al. Stabilisation of α-helices by site-directed mutagenesis reveals the secondary structure in the transition state for acylphosphatase folding. J. Mol. biol. 300, 633–647 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Plaxco, K. W., Simons, K. & Baker, D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rate of single domain proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 277, 985–994 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fersht, A. R., Itzhaki, L. S., elMasry, N. F., Matthews, J. M. & Otzen, D. E. Single versus parallel pathways of protein folding and fractional structure in the transition state. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10426–10429 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Daggett, V., Li, A., Itzhaki, L. S., Otzen, D. E. & Fersht, A. R. Structure of the transition state for folding of a protein derived from experiment and simulation. J. Mol. Biol. 257, 430–440 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazaridis, T. & Karplus, M. “New View” of protein folding reconciled with the old through multiple unfolding simulations. Science 278, 1928–1931 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boczko, E. M. & Brooks, C. L. First-principles calculation of the folding free energy of a three-helix bundle protein. Science 269, 393–396 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Muñoz, V. & Eaton, W. A. A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11311–11316 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Galzitskaya, O. V. & Finkelstein, A. V. A theoretical search for folding/unfolding nuclei in three-dimensional protein structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11299–11304 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Alm, E. & Baker, D. Prediction of protein-folding mechanisms from free-energy landscapes derived from native structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11305–11310 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Micheletti, C., Banavar, J. R., Maritan, A. & Seno, F. Protein structures and optimal folding from a geometrical variational principle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3372–3376 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shoemaker, B. A., Wang, J. & Wolynes, P. G. Exploring structures in protein folding funnels with free energy functionals: The transition state ensemble. J. Mol. Biol. 287, 675–694 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Clementi, C., Jennings, P. A. & Onuchic, J. N. How native-state topology affects the folding of dihydrofolate reductase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5871–5876 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, L., Mirny, L. A. & Shakhnovich, E. I. Kinetics, thermodynamics and evolution of non-native interactions in a protein folding nucleus. Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 336–342 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li, A. & Daggett, V. Characterization of the transition state of protein unfolding by use of molecular dynamics: Chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10430–10434 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vendruscolo, M. & Domany, E. Pairwise contact potentials are unsuitable for protein folding. J. Chem. Phys. 109, 11101–11108 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vendruscolo, M. & Domany, E. Efficient dynamics in the space of contact maps. Fold. Des. 3, 329–336 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou, Y. & Karplus, M. Interpreting the folding kinetics of helical proteins. Nature 401, 400–403 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tanford, C. Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation. Adv. Protein Chem. 24, 1–95 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Berry, R. S., Beck, T. L., Davis, H. L. & Jellinek, J. in Advances in Chemical Physics Vol 70, (eds Prigogine, I. & Rice, S. A.) 75–135 (Wiley, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou, Y., Vitkup, D. & Karplus, M. Native proteins are surface-molten solids: Application of the Lindemann criterion for the solid versus liquid state. J. Mol. Biol. 285, 1371–1375 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Domany, E. Superparamagnetic clustering of data. The definitive solution of an ill posed problem. Physica A 263, 158–169 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank F. Chiti and A. Fersht for discussions and comments on this work. We also thank G. Ramponi and N. Taddei for continuing collaborations involving AcP. The Oxford Centre for Molecular Science is supported by BBSRC, EPSRC and MRC. M.V. is supported by an EMBP long-term fellowship. E.P. is supported in Oxford by an EC fellowship. C.M.D. is supported in part by a programme grant from the Wellcome Trust. M.K. Thanks Oxford University for inviting him to spend a year as Eastman Visiting Professor. Much of this work was done while he was in Oxford; the part done at Harvard was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Christopher M. Dobson or Martin Karplus.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vendruscolo, M., Paci, E., Dobson, C. et al. Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state. Nature 409, 641–645 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35054591

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35054591

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing