Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Multiple seismic discontinuities near the base of the transition zone in the Earth's mantle

Abstract

The seismologically defined boundary between the transition zone in the Earth's mantle (410–660 km depth) and the underlying lower mantle is generally interpreted to result from the breakdown of the γ-spinel phase of olivine1 to magnesium-perovskite and magnesiowustite2. Laboratory measurements of these transformations of olivine have determined that the phase boundary has a negative Clapeyron slope and does indeed occur near pressures corresponding to the base of the transition zone2,3. But a computational study has indicated that, because of the presence of garnet minerals, multiple seismic discontinuities might exist near a depth of 660 km (ref. 4), which would alter the simple negative correlation of changes in temperature with changes in the depth of the phase boundary. In particular, garnet minerals undergo exothermic transformations near this depth, acting to complicate the phase relations5,6,7,8,9 and possibly effecting mantle convection processes in some regions9. Here we present seismic evidence that supports the existence of such multiple transitions near a depth of 660 km beneath southern California. The observations are consistent with having been generated by garnet transformations coupling with the dissociation of the γ-spinel phase of olivine. Temperature anomalies calculated from the imaged discontinuity depths—using Clapeyron slopes determined for the various transformations4—generally match those predicted from an independent P-wave velocity model of the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: P660s and PP660s conversion points for 2,609 receiver functions used in this study.
Figure 2: Stacked receiver functions centred at 34.4, 34.5 and 34.6 °N computed for three different frequencies.
Figure 3: Representative portions of the 3D image beneath southern California showing multiple discontinuities near 660-km depth.
Figure 4: Calculated temperature anomalies for the cross-section at 33.2 °N latitude (Fig. 3b,c).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ringwood, A. E. in Advances in Earth Sciences (ed. Hurley, P. M.) 287–356 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ito, E. & Takahasi, E. Postspinel transformations in the system Mg2SiO4-Fe2SiO4 and some geophysical implications. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 10637–10646 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ito, E., Akaogi, M., Topor, L. & Navrotsky, A. Negative pressure-temperature slopes for reactions forming MgSiO3 perovskite from calorimetry. Science 249, 1275–1278 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vacher, P., Mocquet, A. & Sotin, C. Computation of seismic profiles from mineral physics: the importance of the non-olivine components for explaining the 660 km depth discontinuity. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 106, 275–298 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Herzberg, C. & Gasparik, T. Garnet and pyroxenes in the mantle: a test of the majorite fractionation hypothesis. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 16263–16274 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gasparik, T. Enstatite-jadeite join and its role in the Earth's mantle. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 111, 283–298 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gasparik, T. Melting experiments on the enstatite-diopside join at 70-224 kbar, including the melting of diopside. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 124, 139–153 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gasparik, T. A model for the layered upper mantle. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 100, 197–212 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Weidner, D. J. & Wang, Y. Chemical- and Clapeyron-induced buoyancy at the 660 km discontinuity. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 7431–7441 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ringwood, A. E. Role of the transition zone and 660 km discontinuity in mantle dynamics. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 86, 5–24 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dueker, K. G. & Sheehan, A. F. Mantle discontinuity structure beneath the Colorado Rocky Mountains and High Plains. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 7153–7169 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, A., Fisher, K. M., Wysession, M. E. & Clarke, T. J. Mantle discontinuity and temperature under the North American continental keel. Nature 395, 160–163 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Owens, T. J., Nyblade, A. A., Gurrola, H. & Langston, C. A. 410 and 660 km discontinuity structure beneath Tanzania, East Africa. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 827–830 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Owens, T. J., Zandt, G. & Taylor, S. R. Seismic evidence for an ancient rift beneath the Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee: a detailed analysis of broadband teleseismic P-waveforms. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 7783–7795 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ammon, C. J. The isolation of receiver effects from teleseismic P waveforms. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 81, 2504–2510 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kennett, B. L. N. & Engdahl, E. R. Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification. Geophys. J. Int. 105, 429–465 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Van der lee, S. & Nolet, G. Upper mantle S-velocity structure of North America. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 22815–22838 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stixtrude, L. Structure and sharpness of phase transitions and mantle discontinuities. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 14835–14852 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weidner, D. J. & Wang, Y. Chemical- and Clapeyron-induced buoyancy at the 660 km discontinuity. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 7431–7441 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gurrola, H. & Minster, J. B. Thickness estimates of the upper-mantle transition zone from bootstrapped velocity spectrum stacks of receiver functions. Geophys. J. Int. 133, 31–43 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Niu, F. & Kawakatsu, H. Complex structure of the mantle discontinuities at the tip of the subducting slab beneath the Northeast China: a preliminary investigation of broadband receiver functions. J. Phys. Earth 44, 701–711 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Revenaugh, J. & Jordan, T. H. Mantle layering from ScS reverberations: 2. The transition zone. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 19763–19780 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shearer, P. M. & Flanagan, M. P. Seismic velocity and density jumps across the 410- and 660-kilometer discontinuities. Science 285, 1545–1548 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Anderson, D. L. Theory of the Earth (Blackwell Science, Oxford, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bina, C. R. & Helffrich, G. Phase transition Clapeyron slopes and transition zone seismic discontinuities. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 15853–15860 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the IRIS Data Management Center for data availability and S. van der Lee for expedient delivery and usage of the NA95 velocity model, and K. Dueker for allowing us to use his western USA tomography model before publication. This work was partially supported by the NSF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simmons, N., Gurrola, H. Multiple seismic discontinuities near the base of the transition zone in the Earth's mantle. Nature 405, 559–562 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35014589

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35014589

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing