Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Fractal stream chemistry and its implications for contaminant transport in catchments

Abstract

The time it takes for rainfall to travel through a catchment and reach the stream is a fundamental hydraulic parameter that controls the retention of soluble contaminants and thus the downstream consequences of pollution episodes1,2. Catchments with short flushing times will deliver brief, intense contaminant pulses to downstream waters, whereas catchments with longer flushing times will deliver less intense but more sustained contaminant fluxes. Here we analyse detailed time series of chloride, a natural tracer, in both rainfall and runoff from headwater catchments at Plynlimon, Wales. We show that, although the chloride concentrations in rainfall have a white noise spectrum, the chloride concentrations in streamflow exhibit fractal 1/f scaling over three orders of magnitude. The fractal fluctuations in tracer concentrations indicate that these catchments do not have characteristic flushing times. Instead, their travel times follow an approximate power-law distribution implying that they will retain a long chemical memory of past inputs. Contaminants will initially be flushed rapidly, but then low-level contamination will be delivered to streams for a surprisingly long time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Time series of daily water fluxes and chloride concentrations.
Figure 2: Fig. 2 Power spectra of water fluxes and chloride concentrations.
Figure 3: Travel time distributions and their implications for contaminant transport.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langmuir, D. Aqueous Environmental Geochemistry (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1997).

  2. Schnoor, J. L. Environmental Modeling: Fate and Transport of Pollutants in Water, Air, and Soil (Wiley, New York, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neal, C. & Rosier, P. T. W. Chemical studies of chloride and stable oxygen isotopes in 2 conifer afforested and moorland sites in the British uplands. J. Hydrol. 115, 269– 283 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Neal, C. et al. The hydrochemistry of the River Severn, Plynlimon. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1, 583–617 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Robson, A., Neal, C., Hill, S. & Smith, C. J. Linking variations in short-term and medium-term stream chemistry to rainfall inputs – some observations at Plynlimon, mid-Wales. J. Hydrol. 144, 291–310 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Neal, C. et al. Chloride in precipitation and streamwater for the upland catchment of the River Severn, mid-Wales: some consequences for hydrochemical models. Hydrol. Process. 2, 155– 165 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirkby, C., Newson, M. D. & Gilman, K. Plynlimon research; the first two decades (Institute of Hydrology Report 109, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, UK, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Neal, C., Hill, T. & Reynolds, B. Acid neutralisation capacity measurements in surface and groundwaters in the upper River Severn, Plynlimon: from hydrograph splitting to water flow pathways. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1, 687–696 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neal, C. et al. The occurrence of groundwater in the lower Palaeozoic rocks of upland Wales. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1, 3– 18 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Buttle, J. M. Isotope hydrograph separations and rapid delivery of pre-event water from drainage basins. Prog. Phys. Geog. 18, 16 –41 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sklash, M. G., Beven, K. J., Gilman, K. & Darling, W. G. Isotope studies of pipeflow at Plynlimon, Wales, UK. Hydrol. Process. 10, 921–944 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beven, K. On subsurface stormflow: predictions with simple kinematic theory for saturated and unsaturated flows. Wat. Resour. Res. 18, 1627–1633 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bracewell, R. N. The Fourier Transform and its Applications 3rd edn (McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scargle, J. D. Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data. Astrophys. J. 263, 835–853 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Avnir, D., Biham, O., Lidar, D. & Malcai, O. Is the geometry of nature fractal? Science 279, 39– 40 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Duffy, C. J. & Gelhar, L. W. A frequency domain approach to water quality modeling in groundwater: theory. Wat. Resour. Res. 21, 1175–1184 ( 1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Duffy, C. J. & Gelhar, L. W. A frequency domain analysis of groundwater quality fluctuations: interpretation of field data. Wat. Resour. Res. 22, 1115–1128 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodhe, A., Nyberg, L. & Bishop, K. Transit times for water in a small till catchment from a step shift in the oxygen-18 content of the water input. Wat. Resour. Res. 32, 3497–3511 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Niemi, A. J. Residence time distributions of variable flow processes. Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 28, 855–860 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gelhar, L. W. Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bain, L. in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences (eds. Kotz, S. & Johnson, N. L.) 292–298 (Wiley, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Turner, J. V. & Barnes, C. J. in Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology (eds Kendall, C. & McDonnell, J. J.) 723– 760 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Kreft, A. & Zuber, A. On the physical meaning of the dispersion equation and its solutions for different initial and boundary conditions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 33, 1471– 1480 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sposito, G., White, R. E., Darrah, P. R. & Jury, W. A. A transfer function model of solute transport through soil 3. The convection-dispersion equation. Wat. Resour. Res. 22, 255– 262 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stewart, M. K. & McDonnell, J. J. Modeling base flow soil water residence times from deuterium concentrations. Wat. Resour. Res. 26, 3005–3019 ( 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kavanaugh, M. C. et al. Alternatives for Ground Water Cleanup (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Turcotte, D. L. Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics (Cambridge University Press, 1992).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Korvin, G. Fractal Models in the Earth Sciences (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Neal, C. A view of water quality from the Plynlimon watershed. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1, 743–754 ( 1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our collaboration was supported by a National Science Foundation grant to J.W.K. Sample collection and analysis were supported by the Natural Environment Research Council, the Environment Agency of England and Wales, and the Forestry Commission. We thank the Plynlimon field staff for sample collection, M. Neal for sample analysis, C. Stark for comments on the manuscript, and D. Brillinger for helpful advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James W. Kirchner.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirchner, J., Feng, X. & Neal, C. Fractal stream chemistry and its implications for contaminant transport in catchments. Nature 403, 524–527 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35000537

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35000537

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing