Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Cell-specific nuclear import of plasmid DNA

Abstract

One factor limiting the success of non-viral gene therapy vectors is the relative inability to target genes specifically to a desired cell type. To address this limitation, we have begun to develop cell-specific vectors whose specificity is at the level of the nuclear import of the plasmid DNA. We have recently shown that nuclear import of plasmid DNA is a sequence-specific event, requiring the SV40 enhancer, a region known to bind to a number of general transcription factors (Dean DA, Exp Cell Res 1997; 230: 293). From these studies we developed a model whereby transcription factor(s) bind to the DNA in the cytoplasm to create a protein–DNA complex that can enter the nucleus using the protein import machinery. Our model predicts that by using DNA elements containing binding sites for transcription factors expressed in unique cell types, we should be able to create plasmids that target to the nucleus in a cell-specific manner. Using the promoter from the smooth muscle gamma actin (SMGA) gene whose expression is limited to smooth muscle cells, we have created a series of reporter plasmids that are expressed selectively in smooth muscle cells. Moreover, when injected into the cytoplasm, plasmids containing portions of the SMGA promoter localize to the nucleus of smooth muscle cells, but remain cytoplasmic in fibroblasts and CV1 cells. In contrast, a similar plasmid carrying the SV40 enhancer is transported into the nuclei of all cell types tested. Nuclear import of the SMGA promoter-containing plasmids could be achieved when the smooth muscle specific transcription factor SRF was expressed in stably transfected CV1 cells, supporting our model for the nuclear import of plasmids. Finally, these nuclear targeting sequences were also able to promote increased gene expression in liposome- and polycation-transfected non-dividing cells in a cell-specific manner, similar to their nuclear import activity. These results provide proof of principle for the development of cell-specific non-viral vectors for any desired cell type.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dean DA . Import of plasmid DNA into the nucleus is sequence specific Exp Cell Res 1997 230: 293–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nigg EA . Nucleocytoplasmic transport: signals, mechanisms and regulation Nature 1997 386: 779–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dowty ME et al. Plasmid DNA entry into postmitotic nuclei of primary rat myotubes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995 92: 4572–4576.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hagstrom JE et al. Nuclear import of DNA in digitonin-permeabilized cells J Cell Sci 1997 110: 2323–2331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sebestyén MG et al. DNA vector chemistry: the covalent attachment of signal peptides to plasmid DNA Nature Biotech 1998 16: 80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dean DA, Dean BS, Muller S, Smith LC . Sequence requirements for plasmid DNA nuclear entry (Submitted for publication)

  7. Kovacs AM, Zimmer WE . Cell specific transcription of the smooth muscle γ-actin gene requires both positive and negative acting cis-elements Gene Exp 1998 7: 115–129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zimmer WE, Browning C, Kovacs AM . Cell-specific regulation of the SMGA gene Dev Biol 1996 175: 399 (Abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shimizu RT et al. The smooth muscle α-actin gene promoter is differentially regulated in smooth muscle versus non-smooth muscle cells J Biol Chem 1995 270: 7631–7643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kallmeier R, Somasundaram C, Babji P . A novel smooth muscle enhancer regulates transcription of the smooth muscle myosin heavy chain gene in vascular smooth muscle cells J Biol Chem 1995 270: 30949–30957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herring B, Smith A . Telokin expression is mediated by a smooth muscle specific promoter Am J Physiol 1996 270: C1656–C1665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li L, Miano J, Mercer B, Olson E . Expression of the SM22 α promoter in transgenic mice provides evidence for distinct transcriptional regulatory programs in vascular and visceral smooth muscle cells J Cell Biol 1996 132: 849–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Samaha F et al. Developmental pattern of expression and genomic organization of the calponin-hi gene J Biol Chem 1996 271: 395–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miwa T et al. Structure, chromosome location, and expression of the human smooth muscle (enteric type) gamma-actin gene: evolution of six human actin genes Mol Cell Biol 1991 11: 3296–3306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Szucsick J, Lessard J . Cloning and sequence analysis of the mouse smooth muscle γ-enteric actin gene Genomics 1995 28: 154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Browning CL et al. The developmentally regulated expression of serum response factor plays a key role in the control of smooth muscle-specific genes Dev Biol 1998 194: 18–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Treisman R . Ternary complex factors: growth factor regulated transcriptional activators Curr Opin Genet Dev 1994 4: 96–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Browning C, Zimmer WE . Multiple trans-acting factors bind with promoter elements of the smooth muscle Îł-actin gene to regulate cell specific transcription (Submitted for publication)

  19. Langle-Rouault F et al. Up to 100-fold increase of apparent gene expression in the presence of Epstein–Barr virus oriP sequences and EBNA1: implications of the nuclear import of plasmids J Virol 1998 72: 6181–6185

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. von Schwedler U, Kornbluth RS, Trono D . The nuclear localization signal of the matrix protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 allows the establishment of infection in macrophages and quiescent T lymphocytes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994 91: 6992–6996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bukrinsky MI et al. Active nuclear import of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 preintegration complexes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992 89: 6580–6584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bukrinsky MI et al. A nuclear localization signal within HIV-1 matrix protein that governs infection of non-dividing cells Nature 1993 365: 666–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kann M, Bischof A, Gerlich WH . In vitro model for the nuclear transport of the hepadnavirus genome J Virol 1997 71: 1310–1316.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Greber UF, Kasamatsu H . Nuclear targeting of SV40 and adenovirus Trends Cell Biol 1996 6: 189–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nakanishi A et al. Association with capsid proteins promotes nuclear targeting of simian virus 40 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996 93: 96–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Collas P, Husebye H, Alestrom P . The nuclear localization sequence of the SV40 T antigen promotes transgene uptake and expression in zebrafish embryo nuclei Transgenic Res 1996 5: 451–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Collas P, Alestrom P . Rapid targeting of plasmid DNA to zebrafish embryo nuclei by the nuclear localization signal of SV40 T antigen Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 1997 6: 48–58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pelligrini L, Tan S, Richmond TJ . Structure of serum response factor core bound to DNA Nature 1995 376: 490–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gauthier-Rouvière C et al. The serum response factor nuclear localization signal: general implications for cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase activity in control of nuclear localization Mol Cell Biol 1995 15: 433–444

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Walther C, Gruss P . Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS Development 1991 113: 1435–1449

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mansouri A, Stoykova A, Gruss P . Pax genes in development J Cell Sci Suppl 1994 18 (Suppl.): 35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moser M et al. Cloning and characterization of a second AP-2 transcription factor: AP-2β Development 1995 121: 2779–2788

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Orlic D, Anderson S, Nishikawa S-I, Nienhuis AW . Gene expression in purified murine hematopoietic stem cells Blood 1992 80: 245a

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kovacs AM, Zimmer WE . Molecular cloning and expression of the chicken smooth muscle γ-actin mRNA Cell Mot Cytoskel 1993 24: 67–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen CY et al. Activation of the cardiac α-actin promoter depends upon serum response factor, tinman homologue, NKx-2.5, and intact serum response elements Dev Genet 1996 19: 119–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Croissant JD et al. Avian serum response factor expression restricted primarily to muscle specific lineages is required for α-actin gene transcription Dev Biol 1996 177: 250–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dean DA, Li PL, Lee LM, Kasamatsu H . Essential role of the Vp2 and Vp3 DNA-binding domain in SV40 morphogenesis J Virol 1995 69: 1115–1121

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cambell GR, Chamley JH, Burnstock G . Development of smooth muscle cells in tissue culture J Anat 1974 117: 295–312

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hayward LJ, Schwartz RJ . Sequential expression of chicken actin genes during myogenesis J Cell Biol 1986 102: 1485–1493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson CV, Singer RH, Lawrence JB . Fluorescent detection of nuclear RNA and DNA: implications for genome organization Meth Cell Biol 1991 35: 73–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Curtis Browning and Ileana Aragon for establishing and culturing the chicken embryo fibroblasts and smooth muscle cell cultures, Dr Adrienne Kovacs for the SMGA promoter/CAT constructs, and Dr Paul Babal for providing us with cultures of human smooth muscle cells and for helpful discussions. Supported in part by grants ALG 960006 (DAD) from the Alabama Affiliate of the American Heart Association, 9404341 (WEZ) from the USDA, and R01 HL59956–01 (DAD) and 5P60 HL38639 (DAD and WEZ) from the NIHLB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vacik, J., Dean, B., Zimmer, W. et al. Cell-specific nuclear import of plasmid DNA. Gene Ther 6, 1006–1014 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3300924

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3300924

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links