Letter | Published:

Substance P raises neuronal membrane excitability by reducing inward rectification

Nature volume 315, pages 498501 (06 June 1985) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Much interest has recently centred on the properties of peptides that modulate the excitability of nerve cells. Such compounds include the undecapeptide substance P, which is particularly well established as an excitatory neu retransmitter1,2, and we examine here its effects on magnocellular cholinergic neurones taken from the medial and ventral aspects of the globus pallidus of newborn rats and grown in dissociated culture3. These neurones have previously been shown to respond to substance P3 and are analogous to the nucleus basalis of Meynert in man4,5, which gives a diffuse projection to the cerebral cortex and whose degeneration is the likely cause of Alzheimer's disease5. Substance P depolarizes these cultured neurones by reducing an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance; this conductance has been found in several neuronal types6–9 and has similar properties to those of certain other cells10–13. As discussed below, modulation of inward (or anomalous) rectification by substance P implies a self-reinforcing element to the depolarization caused by the peptide.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & A. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 227–268 (1980).

  2. 2.

    , , , & Ciba Fdn Symp. 91, 13–34 (1982).

  3. 3.

    , , & Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 10, 659 (1984).

  4. 4.

    , & Adv. Neurol. 24, 1–12 (1979).

  5. 5.

    , & Science 219, 1184–1190 (1983).

  6. 6.

    & J. Physiol., Lond. 183, 287–304 (1966).

  7. 7.

    & J. NeuroPhysiol. 30, 1097–1113 (1967).

  8. 8.

    & J. Physiol., Lond. 335, 153–178 (1983).

  9. 9.

    & J. Neurophysiol. 51, 1409–1433 (1984).

  10. 10.

    & J. Membrane Biol. 18, 61–80 (1974).

  11. 11.

    & J. Physiol., Lond. 292, 251–265 (1979).

  12. 12.

    & J. Physiol., Lond. 304, 415–435 (1980).

  13. 13.

    & J. Physiol., Lond. 319, 295–309 (1981).

  14. 14.

    & in Single Channel Recording (eds Sakmann, B. & Neher, E.) 107–122 (Plenum, New York, 1983).

  15. 15.

    & J. Physiol., Lond. 331, 231–252 (1982).

  16. 16.

    , & Proc. R. Soc. B206, 191–208 (1979).

  17. 17.

    & Brain Res. 214, 416–423 (1981).

  18. 18.

    J. Physiol., Lond. 317, 497–508 (1981).

  19. 19.

    J. Physiol., Lond. 175, 134–159 (1964).

  20. 20.

    & J. Physiol., Lond. 213, 21–30 (1971).

  21. 21.

    & J. Physiol., Lond. 308, 287–313 (1980).

  22. 22.

    , & J. Physiol., Lond. 331, 211–230 (1982).

  23. 23.

    , & Br. J. Pharmac. 79, 330–333 (1983).

  24. 24.

    Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmac. 97, 1–67 (1983).

  25. 25.

    & Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 3522–3525 (1983).

  26. 26.

    , & J. gen. Physiol. 67, 621–658 (1976).

  27. 27.

    & Nature 267, 169–170 (1977).

  28. 28.

    J. Physiol., Lond. 209, 231–256 (1970).

  29. 29.

    Science 225, 1365–1370 (1984).

  30. 30.

    & J. Physiol., Lond. 347, 255–277 (1984).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

    • P. R. Stanfield

    Present address: Department of Physiology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA

    • P. R. Stanfield
    • , Yasuko Nakajima
    •  & Kazuhiko Yamaguchi

Authors

  1. Search for P. R. Stanfield in:

  2. Search for Yasuko Nakajima in:

  3. Search for Kazuhiko Yamaguchi in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/315498a0

Further reading Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.