Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Added noise restores recognizability of coarse quantized images

Abstract

When a portrait is coarsely quantized into blocks, the block structure hides the face, although lower spatial frequencies of the original image sufficient by themselves for recognition are preserved. Recognition can be recovered by blurring the image, or otherwise attenuating the spurious higher spatial frequency components1,2. Harmon and Julesz2 claim that high spatial frequencies introduced by quantized blocking mask the lower spatial frequencies which convey information about the face, preventing recognition. Here we show that recognition can be enhanced, without decreasing the amplitude of these spurious higher frequencies, by adding further high-frequency noise to the quantized image. This result is clearly at odds with a theory of high-frequency (or critical band) masking. We suggest that the added noise mutes mechanisms which would otherwise impose a block structure on the image, allowing the alternative perceptual organization of the hidden face to reemerge.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harmon, L. D. in Pattern Recognition in Biological and Technical Systems (eds Grusser, O. J. & Klinke, R.) (Springer, Heidelberg, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harmon, L. D. & Julesz, B. Science 180, 1194–1197 (1973).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stromeyer, C. F. & Julesz, J. J. opt. Soc. Am. 62, 1221–1232 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zwicker, E., Flotlorp, G. & Stevens, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29, 548 (1957).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell, F. W. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B209, 9 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hammond, P. & MacKay, D. M. Expl Brain Res. 22, 427–430 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burr, D. C., Morrone, M. C. & Maffei, L. Expl Brain Res. 43, 455–458 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morrone, M. C., Burr, D. C. & Maffei, L. Proc. R. Soc. B216, 335–354 (1982).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, F. W. & Kulikowski, J. J. J. Physiol., Lond. 187, 437–445 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rao, V. M. & Kulikowski, J. J. Neurosci. Lett. Suppl. 5, S48 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marr, D. Vision, 73–74 (Freeman, San Francisco, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morrone, M., Burr, D. & Ross, J. Added noise restores recognizability of coarse quantized images. Nature 305, 226–228 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/305226a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/305226a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing