Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Solar radius change between 1925 and 1979

Abstract

By analysing numerous reports, from different locations, on the duration of totality of the solar eclipses on 24 January 1925, and on 26 February 1979, we have found that the solar radius at the earlier date was 0.5 arc s, or 375 km larger than at the later date. The correction to the standard solar radius found for each eclipse was different when different subsets of the observations were used (for example, edge of path of totality timings compared with central timings), suggesting the existence of systematic inaccuracies in our knowledge of the lunar figure. However, the differences between the corrections for both eclipses were very similar for all subsets considered, indicating that changes of the solar size may be reliably inferred despite the existence of the lunar figure errors, as long as the proper consideration is made of the distribution of the observations. We consider that these results are strong evidence in support of the occurrence of solar radius changes on shorter than evolutionary time scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Endal, A. S. & Sofia, S. Astrophys. J. 243, 625–640 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sofia, S., O'Keefe, J., Lesh, J. R. & Endal, A. S. Science 204, 1306–1308 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunham, D. W., Sofia, S., Fiala, A. D., Herald, D. & Muller, P. M. Science 210, 1243–1245 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilliland, R. L. Astrophys. J. 248, 1144–1155 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shapiro, I. I. Science 208, 51–53 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parkinson, J. H., Morrison, L. V. & Stephenson, F. R. Nature 288, 548–551 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sofia, S., Dunham, D. W. & Fiala, A. D. in Proc. Conf. Ancient Sun, 147 (Lunar and Planetary Science Institute, Houston, Texas 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Russell, H. N. Scient. Am. January, 13 (1925).

  9. Brown, E. W. Astr. J. 37, 9–19 (1926).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Magalhaes, F. V. et al.. Trans. Illumin. Engng Soc. 20, 565–628 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Seagrave, F. E. Popular Astr. 33, 279 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herald, D. Moon 15, 91–107 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Watts, C. B. Astr. Pap. Am. Ephem. 17, (1964).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sofia, S., Dunham, D., Dunham, J. et al. Solar radius change between 1925 and 1979. Nature 304, 522–526 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/304522a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/304522a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing