Abstract
Optical linear polarization of the Crab Nebula supernova remnant is presumed to be a good example of the astrophysical occurrence of synchrotron emission from relativistic electrons in a magnetic field1–3. However, there have been few attempts to map the spatial distribution of the polarization at the highest possible resolution and with high signal-to-noise ratio, although such observations contain information about the geometry and the small-scale structure of the magnetic field. We describe here observations of the Crab Nebula using a new charge coupled device (CCD) imaging/spectropolarimeter. Two large regions each 150 arc s across were observed with a seeing-limited spatial resolution of 1.5 arc s: the ‘eastern bay’ and the central wisps. The pulsar was included in both fields. In general, we find no evidence for substantial small-scale (1.5 arc s) structure in the projected magnetic field, but there are changes on scales of the order of 5 arc s which would be barely discernible by photographic methods. In addition, there is remarkable organization of the field over domains ranging in size from 10 to 30 arc s. The uncertainty about, the nebular polarization component near the pulsar is resolved. The presence or absence of small-scale structure in the field is important in understanding the energy transport mechanism for the relativistic electrons, and little is known about the connection between small polarization features and the remarkable filamentary structure in the nebula. Photographic maps2 had a resolution of only 5.25 arc s and rather limited polarimetric accuracy; more recent photoelectric measurements4 yielded 1 × 3 arc s resolution but only in a small patch. Instrumental technique is crucial.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shklovskij, I. S. Cosmic Radio Waves (transl. Rodman, R. B. & Varsavsky, D. M.) (Harvard University Press, 1960).
Woltjer, L. Bull. astr. Inst., Netherlands 13, 301–311 (1957).
Rees, M. J. & Gunn, J. E. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 167, 1–12 (1974).
Schmidt, G. D., Angel, J. R. P. & Beaver, E. A. Astrophys. J. 227, 106–113 (1979).
McLean, I. S., Cormack, W. A., Herd, J. T. & Aspin, C. Soc. Phot. Inst. Engng. 290, 155–158 (1980).
Hiltner, W. A. Astrophys. J. 125, 300 (1957).
Gehrels, T. Planets, Stars and Nebulae Studied with Photopolarimetry, 1028 (ed. Gehrels, T.) (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1974).
Kristian, J., Visvanathan, N., Westphal, J. A. & Snellen, G. H. Astrophys. J. 162, 475–483 (1970).
Wampler, E. J., Scargle, J. D. & Miller, J. S. Astrophys. J. Lett 157, L1–L10 (1969).
Jones, D. H. P., Smith, F. G. & Wallace, P. T. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 196, 943–953 (1981).
Martin, P. G. & Angel, J. R. P. Astrophys. J. 193, 343–351 (1974).
Baldwin, J. R. The Crab Nebula, IAU Symp. No. 46, 22–31 (1971).
Scargle, J. D. Astrophys. J. 156, 401–426 (1969).
Felton, J. E. in Planets, Stars and Nebulae Studied with Photopolarimetry (ed. Gehrels, T.) 1014–1028 (University of Arizona Press, 1974).
Wolff, R. S. & Novick, R. Astrophys. Lett. 18, 29–33 (1976).
Adams, D. J., Eaton, N. C. & Lawson, P. A. Observatory 103, 20–24 (1983).
Cocke, W. J., Disney, M. J., Muncaster, G. W. & Gehrels, T. Nature 227, 1327–1329 (1969).
Disney, M. J. Astrophys. Lett 9, 9–12 (1971).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McLean, I., Aspin, C. & Reitsema, H. High-resolution polarization images of Crab Nebula with a charge-coupled device camera. Nature 304, 243–246 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/304243a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/304243a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.