Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Intelligence, guesswork, language

Nature volume 304, pages 207–209 (1983)Cite this article

A satisfactory definition of intelligence has never been found, and as a result it means different things to different people. What it is may remain too complex for a succinct definition, but the theory and practice of information handling have clarified what it does fur us: it enables us to guess better, and the discovery of unexpected orderliness is the chief means of doing this.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Boring, E.G. New Republic 34, 35–37 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heim, A. The Appraisal of Intelligence (Methuen, London, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tunstall, O., Gudjonsson, G. & Eysenek, H.J. Bull. Br. psychol. Soc. 35, 324–331; 333 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heim, A. Bull. Br. psychol. Soc. 35, 332–333; 355 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hunt, E. Science 219, 141–146 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eckberg, D.L. Intelligence and Race (Praeger, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eysenek, H.J. A Model for Inelligence.

  8. Jensen, A.R. Bias in Mental Testing (Methuen, London, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Macphail, E.M. Brain and Intelligence in Vertebrates (Clarendon, Oxford, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Green, D.M. & Swets, J.A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Wiley, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher, R.A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1925).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Rose, A. Proc. Inst. Radio Engrs 30, 293–300 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heeht, S., Shlaer, S. & Pirenne, M.H. J. gen. Physiol. 25, 293–300 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barlow, H.B. & Reeves, B.C. Vision Res. 19, 783–793 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boole, G. An Investigation of the Laws of Thought (1854; reprinted by Dover, New York).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Attneave, F. Psychol. Rev. 61, 183–193.

  17. Barlow, H.B. in Sensory Communication (ed. Rosenblith, W.) 217–234 (M.I.T. Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fatmi, H.A. & Young, R.W. Nature 228, 97 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barlow, H.B. Nature 228, 1008 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fodor, J.A. The Language of Thought (Cromwell, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meltzer, B. Proc. 6th Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence 1127–1130 (1979).

  22. Sloman, A. Proc. Aslib/BCS Conf. (Aslib, London, 1979).

  23. Barlow, H.B. Perception 3, 123–134 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kenneth Craik Laboratory, Department of Physiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK

    H.B. Barlow

Authors
  1. H.B. Barlow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barlow, H. Intelligence, guesswork, language. Nature 304, 207–209 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/304207a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/304207a0

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing