Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A new test of the cosmological interpretation of QSO redshifts

Abstract

Close QSO pairs can be used to test the cosmological interpretation of QSO redshifts. If (some of) the narrow absorption lines in QSO spectra arise in intervening matter, and if QSOs are surrounded by gaseous haloes or located in regions of high matter density (for example, clusters of galaxies), one may expect to find absorption in the spectrum of one QSO at the redshift of a foreground QSO which happens to be located nearby on the plane of the sky (‘associated absorption’). According to the cosmological interpretation, the foreground QSO should have the lower redshift. If, on the other hand, QSO redshifts are unrelated to their distances, one would expect to find as many cases in which the foreground QSO has the higher redshift of the two; or if the absorption lines are not even due to intervening matter, there should be no coincidences of absorption and emission redshifts beyond random expectation. Thus, by using associated absorption to distinguish which QSO of a pair is in front of the other, we have a simple and straightforward test of the cosmological interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sargent, W. L. W., Young, P. J., Boksenberg, A. & Tytler, D. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 42, 41 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Young, P., Sargent, W. L. W. & Boksenberg, A. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 48, 455 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burbidge, E. M., Smith, H. E., Weymann, R. J. & Williams, R. E. Astrophys. J. 218, 1 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaver, P. A. & Robertson, J. G. Astrophys. J. Lett. (in the press).

  5. Wright, A. E., Morton, D. C., Peterson, B. A. & Jauncey, D. L. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 199, 81 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaver, P. A., Boksenberg, A. & Robertson, J. G. Astrophys. J. Lett. 261, L7 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sargent, W. L. W., Young, P. & Schneider, D. P. Astrophys. J. 256, 374 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robertson, J. G. & Shaver, P. A. Preprint.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaver, P., Robertson, J. A new test of the cosmological interpretation of QSO redshifts. Nature 303, 155–156 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/303155a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/303155a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing