Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A molecular basis for the two locus model of human complement component C4

Abstract

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-linked fourth component of complement (C4) shows a high degree of polymorphism in several animal species1–4. In man C4 polymorphism was detected by distinct charge differences of the variants5–7. O'Neill et al.8 showed that this C4 polymorphism was controlled by two closely linked genetic loci, F (C4A) and S (C4B) and these results were extended by Awdeh et al.9 with an improved typing method. Biochemical analysis of human C4 has revealed that it consists of three polypeptide chains, α, β and γ10. In all reports so far on the molecular analysis of human C410–13, no molecular weight differences between the A and B locus-encoded molecules have been noticed. Here we demonstrate that the C4A and C4B locus-encoded α-chains have a molecular weight (MW) of 96,000 and 94,000, respectively, presenting for the first time a molecular basis for the difference between all C4A and C4B variants tested. Even rare variants that are difficult to allocate to the A or B locus on the basis of charge differences14,15 could be identified as C4A or C4B variants in this way, thereby providing new insights into the relationships between the C4A and C4B loci.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rittner, C. Hum. Genet. 35, 1–20 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shreffler, D. C. Transplantn Rev. 32, 140–167 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shreffler, D. C., Atkinson, J. P., Brown, L. J., Parker, K. L. & Roos, M. H. in 7th International Convocation on Immunology Niagara Falls, New York, 1980 (eds Zaleski, M., Abeyounis, C. J. & Kano, K.) 78–88 (Karger, Basel, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alper, Ch.A. in The Role of the Major Histocompatibility Complex in Immunobiology (ed. Dorf, M. E.) 173–220 (Garland STPM, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Teisberg, P., Åkeson, P., Olaisen, B., Geddedahl, T. Jr & Thorsby, E. Nature 264, 253–254 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mauff, G., Bender, K. & Fisher, B. Vox Sang 34, 296–301 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rittner, C. et al. Immunobiology 158, 119–128 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O'Neill, G. J., Young Yang, S. & Dupont, B. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 5165–5169 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Awdeh, Z. H. & Alper, C. A. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 3567–3580 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schreiber, R. D. & Müller-Eberhardt, H. J. J. exp. Med. 140, 1324–1335 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bolotin, C., Morris, S., Tack, B. & Prahl, J. Biochemistry 16, 2008–2015 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gigli, I., Von Zabern, I. & Porter, R. P. Biochem. J. 165, 439–446 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lundwall, A., Malmheden, I., Stalenheim, G. & Sjöquist, J. Eur. J. Biochem. 117, 141–146 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mauff, G. Forensic Sci. Int. 18, 291 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rittner, C. et al. (in preparation).

  16. O'Neill, G. J., Yang, S. Y., Tegoli, J., Berger, R. & Dupont, B. Nature 273, 668–679 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tilley, C. A., Romans, D. G. & Crookston, M. C. Nature 276, 713–715 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chu, V. F. H., Marsh, W. L. & Gigli, I. J. Immun. 128, 181–185 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roos, M. H. & Démant, P. Immunogenetics 15, 23–30 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roos, M. H., Atkinson, J. P. & Shreffler, D. C. J. Immun. 121, 1106–1115 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferreira, A., Nussenzweig, A. & Gigli, I. J. exp. Med. 148, 1186–1197 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carroll, M. C. & Capra, J. D. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 2424–2428 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Müller-Eberhardt, H. J. A. Rev. Biochem. 44, 697–724 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Middelton, J. et al. Tissue Antigens 4, 366–373 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Giles, C. M. et al. Tissue Antigens 8, 143–149 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Merag, B., Olaisen, B. & Teisberg, P. Scand. J. Immun. 14, 303–307 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roos, M. H., Kornfeld, S. & Shreffler, D. C. J. Immun. 124, 2860–2863 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laemmli, U. K. Nature 227, 680–682 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rittner, C. & Mollenhauer, E. Ärztl. Lab. 27, 232–238 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roos, M., Mollenhauer, E., Démant, P. et al. A molecular basis for the two locus model of human complement component C4. Nature 298, 854–856 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/298854a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/298854a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing