Abstract
Bouwmeester et al. reply — Braunstein and Kimble observe correctly that, in the Innsbruck experiment, one does not always observe a teleported photon conditioned on a coincidence recording at the Bell-state analyser. In their opinion, this affects the fidelity of the experiment, but we believe, in contrast, that it has no significance, and that when a teleported photon appears, it has all the properties required by the teleportation protocol. These properties can never be achieved by “abandoning teleportation altogether and transmitting randomly selected polarization states” as Braunstein and Kimble suggest. The fact that there will be events where no teleported photons are created merely affects the efficiency of the experiment. This suggests that the measure of fidelity used by Braunstein and Kimble is unsuitable for our experiment.
Main
During the detection of the teleported photons, no selection was performed based on the properties of these photons. Therefore, no aposteriori measurement in the usual sense as a selective measurement was performed. The detection of the teleported photon could have been avoided altogether if we had used a more expensive detector, p, that could distinguish between one- and two-photon absorption. The inability of our teleportation experiment to perform such refined detections does not, however, imply that “a teleported state can never emerge as a freely propagating state⃛”. Braunstein and Kimble do not, therefore, reveal a principal flaw in our teleportation procedure, but merely address a non-trivial practical question.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bouwmeester, D., Pan, JW., Daniell, M. et al. A posteriori teleportation. Nature 394, 841 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/29678
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/29678
This article is cited by
-
Entanglement and phase
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts (2005)
-
Experimental realization of freely propagating teleported qubits
Nature (2003)
-
Quantum information processing with atoms and photons
Nature (2002)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.