Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Comparative antiviral efficiency of leukocyte and bacterially produced human α-interferon in rhesus monkeys

Abstract

Interferons are being tested as antiviral and antitumour agents in man1–5, but because of their limited availability, clinical trials have remained inconclusive. Most of the interferon (IFN) preparations tested in man have been derived from human peripheral blood, buffy-coat leukocytes (HuIFN-α)6 induced by Sendai virus or from human diploid fibroblastoid cells (HuIFN-β) superinduced with poly(rI)-poly(rC)7. As production of interferon from leukocytes is restricted by the availability of blood donors, and production from cultured cells is a laborious and relatively costly process, the use of recombinant DNA technology may provide the most economical approach to the large-scale production of pure species of human interferon. The testing of such interferons is in its infancy. With the availability of bacterially produced HuIFN-α2 we have been able to compare its activity against vaccinia virus infection of the rhesus monkey with that of HuIFN-α from leukocyte buffy coats. Here we provide evidence that the two human α-interferons have comparable antiviral activity but that the bacterially produced form has fewer side effects, at least in the rhesus monkey.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stewart, W. E. II The Interferon System (Springer, New York, 1979).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott, G. M. & Tyrell, D. A. J. Br. med. J. 280, 1558–1562 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krim, M. Blood 55, 875–884 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sikora, K. Br. med. J. 281, 855–858 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Priestman, T. J. Lancet ii, 113–118 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cantell, K. & Hirvonen, S. J. gen. Virol. 39, 541–543 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Billiau, A. et al. Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 16, 49–55 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagata, S. et al. Nature 284, 316–320 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Masucci, M. G. et al. Science 209, 1431–1435 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goeddel, D. et al. Nature 287, 411–417 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Allen, G. & Fantes, K. H. Nature 287, 408–411 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubinstein, M. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 640–644 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagata, S., Brack C., Henco, K., Schamböck, A. & Weissmann, C. J. Interferon Res. 1, 333–336 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Streuli, M., Nagata, S. & Weissmann, C. Science 209, 1343–1347 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mantei, N. et al. Gene 10, 1–10 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weimar, W., Stitz, L., Billiau, A., Cantell, K. & Schellekens, H. J. gen. Virol. 48, 25–30 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schellekens, H., Weimar, W., Cantell, K. & Stitz, L. Nature 278, 742 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schellekens, H. & Weimar, W. thesis, Erasmus Univ., Rotterdam (1980).

  19. Scott, G. M. et al. Br. med. J. 282, 1345–1348 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schellekens, H., de Reus, A., Bolhuis, R. et al. Comparative antiviral efficiency of leukocyte and bacterially produced human α-interferon in rhesus monkeys. Nature 292, 775–776 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/292775a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/292775a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing