Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Subpopulations of cultured chick sympathetic neurones differ in their requirements for survival factors

Abstract

Peripheral autonomic and sensory neurones derived from the neural crest will survive in vitro only if the culture medium is supplemented with specific factors (for review see ref. 1). For example, the nerve growth factor (NGF), although supporting the survival of sympathetic and spinal sensory neurones2, is ineffective on parasympathetic neurones3, whereas medium conditioned by chick heart cells (HCM) supports the survival of all three neuronal types4. We showed previously that the requirements of cultured spinal sensory ganglion neurones for survival factors changed during development, and so provided a basis for the classification of such factors5. We now demonstrate that cultured post-mitotic neurones from chick paravertebral sympathetic ganglia respond differentially to NGF, HCM and medium conditioned by C6 glioma cells (GCM). Thus, these three survival factors are functionally distinct in that they support the survival in culture of discrete subpopulations of sympathetic neurones. Those subpopulations responding to HCM and NGF are shown to differ not only in their requirements for survival factors but also in their contents of the cholinergic and adrenergic marker enzymes choline acetyl-transferase (ChAT) and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Varon, S. S. & Bunge, R. P. A. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 327–361 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Levi-Montalcini, R. & Angeletti, P. U. Devl Biol. 7, 653–659 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Helfand, S. L., Smith, G. A. & Wessels, N. K. Devl Biol. 50, 541–547 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Helfand, S. L., Riopelle, R. T. & Wessels, N. K. Expl Cell Res. 113, 39–45 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barde, Y. A., Edgar, D. & Thoenen, H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 1199–1203 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Greene, L. A. Devl Biol. 58, 96–105 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamburger, V. & Hamilton, H. L. J. Morph. 88, 49–92 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Collins, F. Devl Biol. 65, 50–57 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chamley, J. H., Mark, G. E., Campbell, G. R. & Burnstock, G. Z. Zellforsch. 135, 287–314 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Edds, L. L. & van Horn, C. J. comp. Neurol. 191, 65–76 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patterson, P. H. A. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 1–17 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marchisio, P. C. & Consolo, S. J. Neurochem. 15, 759–764 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ross, L. L., Cosio, L., Witczak, L. & Smolen, A. Anat. Rec. 190, 525 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vogel, Z., Sytkowski, A. J. & Nirenberg, M. W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69, 3180–3184 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fonnum, F. J. Neurochem. 24, 407–409 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. White, H. L. & Cavallito, C. J. J. Neurochem. 17, 1579–1589 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Levitt, M., Gibb, J. W., Daly, J. W., Lipton, M. & Udenfriend, S. Biochem. Pharmac. 16, 1313–1321 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Black, I. B. Brain Res. 95, 170–176 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lerner, P., Nosé, P., Ames, M. P. & Lovenberg, W. Neurochem. Res. 3, 641–651 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Udenfriend, S., Nirenberg, P. Z. & Nagatsu, T. Biochem. Pharmac. 14, 837–845 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bradford, M. M. Analyt. Biochem. 72, 248–254 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edgar, D., Barde, YA. & Thoenen, H. Subpopulations of cultured chick sympathetic neurones differ in their requirements for survival factors. Nature 289, 294–295 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/289294a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/289294a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing