Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Energy and trace-gas fluxes across a soil pH boundary in the Arctic

Abstract

Studies and models of trace-gas flux in the Arctic consider temperature and moisture to be the dominant controls over land–atmosphere exchange1,2, with little attention having been paid to the effects of different substrates. Likewise, current Arctic vegetation maps for models of vegetation change recognize one or two tundra types3,4 and do not portray the extensive regions with different soils within the Arctic. Here we show that rapid changes to ecosystem processes (such as photosynthesis and respiration) that are related to changes in climate and land usage will be superimposed upon and modulated by differences in substrate pH. A sharp soil pH boundary along the northern front of the Arctic Foothills in Alaska separates non-acidic (pH > 6.5) ecosystems to the north from predominantly acidic (pH < 5.5) ecosystems to the south. Moist non-acidic tundra has greater heat flux, deeper summer thaw (active layer), is less of a carbon sink, and is a smaller source of methane than moist acidic tundra.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Maps of the study area.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rastetter, E. B., McKane, R. B., Shaver, G. R., Nadelhoffer, K. J. & Giblin, A. in Global Change and Arctic Terrestrial Ecosystems (eds Oechel, W. C. et al.) 437–451 (Springer, New York, (1997)).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Vourlitis, G. L. & Oechel, W. C. in Global Change and Arctic Terrestrial Ecosystems (eds Oechel, W. C. et al.) 266–289 (Springer, New York, (1997)).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Lynch, A., Chapman, W., Walsh, J. & Weller, G. Development of a regional climate model of the Western Arctic. J. Clim. 8, 1556–1570 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Prentice, I. C.et al. Aglobal biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. J. Biogeogr. 19, 117–134 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weller, G.et al. The Arctic Flux Study: a regional view of trace gas release. J. Biogeogr. 22, 365–374 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Muller, S. V.et al. Accuracy assessment of a land-cover map of the Kuparuk River basin, Alaska: Considerations for remote regions. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens. (in the press).

  7. Walker, D. A. & Everett, K. R. Loess ecosystems of northern Alaska: regional gradient and toposequence at Prudhoe Bay. Ecol. Monogr. 61, 437–464 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Walker, M. D., Walker, D. A. & Auerbach, N. A. Plant communities of a tussock tundra landscape in the brooks Range Foothills, Alaska. J. Veg. Sci. 5, 843–866 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker, D. A., Auerbach, N. A. & Shippert, M. M. NDVI, biomass, and landscape evolution of glaciated terrain in northern Alaska. Polar Rec. 31, 169–178 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bockheim, J. G., Walker, D. A. & Everett, L. R. in Advances of Soil Science. Proc. Int. Symp. Carbon Sequestration in Soil (eds Lal, R., Kimble, J. M., Follett, R. F. & Stewart, B. A.) 143–155 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, (1996)).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michaelson, G. J., Ping, C. L. & Kimble, J. M. Carbon storage and distribution in tundra soils of Arctic Alaska, U.S.A. Arct. Alp. Res. 28, 414–424 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matveyeva, N. V. Zonation in Plant Cover of the Arctic (Russian Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the Komarov Botanical Institute, No. 21, (1998)).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Washburn, A. L. Geocryology: A Survey of Periglacial Processes and Environments (Halsted/Wiley, New York, (1980)).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bockheim, J. G., Walker, D. A., Everett, L. R., Nelson, F. E. & Shiklomanov, N. I. Soils and cryoturbation in moist nonacidic and acidic tundra in the Kuparuk river basin, arctic Alaska, U.S.A. Arct. Alp. Res.(in the press).

  15. Ebersole, J. J. Vegetation Disturbance and Recovery at the Oumalik Oil Well, Arctic Coastal Plain, Alaska. Thesis, Univ. Colorado, Boulder (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walker, D. A.et al. Landsat-assisted Environmental Mapping in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska (U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, CRREL Report 82-37, (1982)).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Carter, L. D. APleistocene sand sea on the Alaskan Arctic Coastal Plain. Science 211, 381–383 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, T., Osterkamp, T. E. & Stamnes, K. Some characteristics of the climate in Northern Alaska, U.S.A. Arct. Alp. Res. 28, 509–518 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shippert, M., Walker, D. A., Auerbach, N. A. & Lewis, B. E. Biomass and leaf-area index maps derived from SPOT images for Toolik Lake and Imnavait Creek areas, Alaska. Polar Rec. 31, 147–154 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Benninghhoff, W. S. Interaction of vegetation and soil frost phenomena. Arctic 5, 34–44 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heinselman, M. L. Landscape evolution, peatland types, and the environment in the Lake Agassiz Peatlands Natural Area, Minnesota. Ecol. Monogr. 40, 235–261 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sjörs, H. Divergent succession in mires, a comparative study. Aquilo Ser. Bot. 28, 67–77 (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Klinger, L. F. Coupling of soils and vegetation in peatland succession. Arct. Alp. Res. 28, 380–387 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson, F. E.et al. Estimating active-layer thickness over large regions: Kuparuk River Basin, Alaska. Arct. Alp. Res. 29, 367–378 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Eugster, W., McFadden, J. P. & Chapin, F. S. I. Acomparative approach to regional variation in surface fluxes using mobile eddy correlation towers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 85, 293–307 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vourlitis, G. L. & Oechel, W. C. Landscape-scale CO2, H2O vapour and energy flux of moist-wet coastal tundra ecosystems over two growing seasons. J. Ecol. 85, 575–590 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lemme, D., Ping, C. L. & Michaelson, G. J. Effect of temperature, soil, and permafrost on microbial respiration of CO2 from acidic and nonacidic tundra. LAII Science Workshop (LAII Science Mangement Office, University of Alaska Fairbanks, (1997)).

  28. Oechel, W. C., Vourlitis, G. & Hastings, S. J. Cold-season CO2 emission from arctic soils. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 11, 163–172 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bockheim, J. G. & Tarnocai, C. in Handbook of Soil Science (eds Sumner, M. E. et al.) (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, in the press).

  30. Whalen, S. C. & Reeburgh, W. S. Amethane flux transect along the trans-Alaska pipeline haul road. Tellus 42B, 237–249 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The following US National Science Foundation projects contributed to this work: Arctic Transitions in the Land-Atmosphere System, the Flux Study, the Arctic Long-Term Ecology Research project, and the International Tundra Experiment. The US Department of Energy's Response, Resistance, Resilience, and Recovery of Arctic Ecosystems to Disturbance project also made significant contributions to the data used in the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Walker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, D., Auerbach, N., Bockheim, J. et al. Energy and trace-gas fluxes across a soil pH boundary in the Arctic. Nature 394, 469–472 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/28839

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/28839

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing