Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Relationships between sister chromatid exchange and mutagenicity, toxicity and DNA damage

Abstract

Reciprocal exchanges of DNA in sister chromatids (SCEs) are induced by various carcinogens and mutagens1–5, although the quantitative relationship between the number of mutations and SCEs induced varies among chemicals5. Nevertheless, the analysis of SCE production by various agents is often proposed as a sensitive and quantitative assay for genetic damage of the sort leading to mutation and cancer. In V-79 Chinese hamster cells we have been measuring DNA damage by alkaline elution, mutation induction as detected by 6-thioguanine resistance, and cytotoxicity as detected by colony formation for different physical and chemical agents. Some of the agents produced varying forms of DNA damage but undetectable increases in either mutation or toxicity. We report here that some undetectably mutagenic and/or toxic agents produce increases in SCE frequency and that DNA single-strand breaks, DNA–DNA interstrand cross-links, and DNA–protein cross-links are not necessary for SCE.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Latt, S. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 3162–3166 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kato, H. Expl Cell Res. 85, 239–247 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Perry, P. & Evans, H. J. Nature 258, 121–125 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolff, S., Rodin, B. & Cleaver, J. E. Nature 265, 347–349 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carrano, A. V., Thompson, L. H., Lindl, P. A. & Minkler, J. L. Nature 271, 551–553 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradley, M. O. & Sharkey, N. A. Nature 266, 724–726 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bradley, M. O. & Sharkey, N. A. Nature 274, 607–608 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zweling, L. A., Bradley, M. O., Sharkey, N. A., Anderson, T. & Kohn, K. W. Mutat. Res. 67, 271–280 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohn, K. W., Erickson, L. C., Ewig, R. A. & Friedman, C. A. Biochemistry 15, 4629–4637 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bradley, M. O., Erickson, L. C. & Kohn, K. W. Biochim. biophys. Acta 520, 11–20 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Erickson, L. C., Bradley, M. O. & Kohn, K. W. Biochim. biophys. Acta (submitted).

  12. Bradley, M. O., Erickson, L. C. & Kohn, K. W. Mutat. Res. (submitted).

  13. Perry, P. E. & Wolff, S. Nature 251, 156–158 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Colton, T. Statistics in Medicine, 221–223 (Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobson, E. O. et al. Mutat. Res. 51, 61–67 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kinsella, A. & Radman, M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 6149–6153 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolff, S. & Rodin, B. Science 200, 543–545 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stolz, D. R., Stavric, B., Klassen, R., Bendall, R. O. & Craig, J. J. envir. Path. Tox. 1, 139–146 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leonard, A. & Leonard, E. D. J. envir. Path. Tox. 2, 1047–1053 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradley, M., Hsu, I. & Harris, C. Relationships between sister chromatid exchange and mutagenicity, toxicity and DNA damage. Nature 282, 318–320 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/282318a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/282318a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing