Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Do circadian oscillators ever stop in constant light?

Abstract

A TWO-DIMENSIONAL limit cycle model (Fig. 1) predicts the behaviour in darkness of both the Drosophila pseudoobscura circadian eclosion rhythm1,2 and the mosquito Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus Say (C p. fatigans Wied.) flight activity rhythm3,4. This model has been extended to explain features of rhythms in very dim light, but in constant ‘bright’ light it has been suggested that the dynamics are fundamentally different, with the system having a globally stable equilibrium point and hence no stable oscillation1. We propose here a simplifying modification: for each light intensity the dynamics are topologically equivalent, and thus for each there is a limit cycle, its position and amplitude being continuous functions of intensity. This interpretation avoids the awkward discontinuity between ‘light’ and ‘dark’ dynamics and emphasises the possibility of time-keeping at all light intensities. Furthermore, it provides a simple explanation for novel features of the Culex rhythm described here and previously3, and allows us to treat some important differences between Culex and Drosophila as merely quantitative. Finally, it suggests a new general strategy for the analysis of circadian rhythms and allows extensions of established theory that explain previously paradoxical results obtained for the two species (E.L.P. in preparation).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pavlidis, T. Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences Vol. 1 (ed. Gerstenhaber, M.) 88–112 (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Winfree, A. T. J. theor. Biol. 28, 327–374 (1970), J. comp. Physiol. 85, 105–140 (1973), Science 183, 970–972 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones, M. D. R. Nature 261, 491–492 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterson, E. L. Behaviour (in the press).

  5. Pittendrigh, C. S. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 54, 275–307 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pittendrigh, C. S. The Molecular Basis of Circadian Rhythms (eds Hastings, J. W. & Schweiger, H-G.) 85–108 (Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pavlidis, T. Bull. math. Biol. 40, 625–635 (1978), 675–692 (1978).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PETERSON, E., JONES, M. Do circadian oscillators ever stop in constant light?. Nature 280, 677–679 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/280677a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/280677a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing