Abstract
Naeem and Li1 present the results of a microcosm study in which species diversity of organisms within trophic groups was varied. They conclude that the existence of multiple species within these groups enhanced the “reliability” of these systems, that is, the increased likelihood of a consistent level of performance over a given unit of time. But there are problems with their study. For the least diverse communities, one predator species was randomly selected from a selection of two, one autotroph from a selection of three, one consumer of bacteria from a selection of five, and one omnivore from a selection of six. Meanwhile, with the most diverse communities, both predator species and all three autotroph species were used, three consumer bacteria were chosen from the five and three omnivores from the six.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Naeem, S. & Li, S. Nature 390, 507–509 (1997).
Grime, J. P. Science 277, 1260–1261 (1997).
Huston, M. A. Oecologia 110, 449–460 (1997).
Wardle, D. A., Zackrisson, O., Hörnberg, G. & Gallet, C. Science 278, 1867–1869 (1997).
Tilman, D. et al. Science 278, 1866–1867 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wardle, D. A more reliable design for biodiversity study?. Nature 394, 30 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/27812
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/27812
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.