Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Scientific Correspondence
  • Published:

A more reliable design for biodiversity study?

Abstract

Naeem and Li1 present the results of a microcosm study in which species diversity of organisms within trophic groups was varied. They conclude that the existence of multiple species within these groups enhanced the “reliability” of these systems, that is, the increased likelihood of a consistent level of performance over a given unit of time. But there are problems with their study. For the least diverse communities, one predator species was randomly selected from a selection of two, one autotroph from a selection of three, one consumer of bacteria from a selection of five, and one omnivore from a selection of six. Meanwhile, with the most diverse communities, both predator species and all three autotroph species were used, three consumer bacteria were chosen from the five and three omnivores from the six.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Naeem, S. & Li, S. Nature 390, 507–509 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grime, J. P. Science 277, 1260–1261 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huston, M. A. Oecologia 110, 449–460 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wardle, D. A., Zackrisson, O., Hörnberg, G. & Gallet, C. Science 278, 1867–1869 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tilman, D. et al. Science 278, 1866–1867 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wardle, D. A more reliable design for biodiversity study?. Nature 394, 30 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/27812

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/27812

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing