Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effect of the reaction HO2 + O3 → OH + 2O2 on stratospheric ozone

Abstract

THE recent measurements1–3 of large values (8.1 ± 1.5 and (8.2 ± 2.7 × 10−12 cm3 s−1) of the rate coefficient for the reaction NO + HO2 → NO2 + OH (1) have led to some important revisions in our understanding of stratospheric photochemistry4. In particular, the predicted ozone perturbations due to the injection of nitrogen oxides by supersonic transport aircraft have become net ozone gains instead of losses5, while the predicted ozone depletion due to ozone-active chlorine from chlorofluoromethanes has almost doubled4. An unfavourable result of the adoption of the larger value of the rate coefficient for reaction (1) has been the prediction of excessive amounts of stratospheric ozone (10–20% more than the measured concentrations) both in terms of the total column abundance and the concentration profile at altitudes below 40 km. Attempts to remedy this discrepancy between theory and observation by altering the simulated lower stratosphere transport and by increasing the assumed amount of ozone-active chlorine were not successful. It is the purpose of this letter, however, to show that another recent measurement by Zahniser and Howard6 of the rate coefficient, k2, for the reaction HO2 + O3 → OH + 2O2 (2) largely resolves these problems of excessive stratospheric ozone in models. Zahniser and Howard have reported the first direct measurement of the reaction between HO2 and ozone (reaction 2). Their temperature-dependent rate coefficient is k2 = (1.4 ± 0.4) × 10−14 exp [−(580 ± 100)/T] cm3 s−1 which at stratospheric temperatures is 4 to 5 times larger than the value recommended in the report of the NASA Chlorofluoromethane (CFM) Workshop4, that is, 7.3 × 10−14 exp (−1,275/T) cm3 s−1.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Howard, C. J. & Evenson, K. M. Geophys. Res. Lett. 4, 437 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burrows, J. P., Cliff, D. K., Harris, G. W. & Thrush, B. A. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (in the press).

  3. Wilkinson, J. P. T. W.M.O. Symp. Toronto (1978).

  4. Hudson, R. D. (ed.) NASA Ref. Publ. 1010 (1977).

  5. Poppoff, I. G., Whitten, R. C., Turco, R. P. & Capone, L. A. NASA Ref. Publ. 1026 (1978).

  6. Zahniser, M. S. & Howard, C. J. 4th Bienniel Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society, Boulder, Colorado (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Simonaitis, R. & Heicklen, J. J. phys. Chem. 77, 1932 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DeMore, W. B. & Tschuikow-Roux, E. J. phys. Chem. 78, 1447 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cox, R. A. IAGA/IAMAP Joint Assembly, Seattle, Washington (1977).

  10. Hamilton, E. J., Naleway, C. A. & Ruey-Rong, L. Int. J. chem. Kin. 9, 87 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Borucki, W. J. et al. AIAA Jour. 14, 1738 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitten, R. C. et al. NASA Tech. Pap. 1003 (1977).

  13. Wilcox, R. W., Nastrom, G. D. & Belmont, A. D. J. appl. Meteorol. 16, 290 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heath, D. R., Mateer, C. L. & Krueger, A. J. PAGEOPH 106–108, 1238 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WHITTEN, R., BORUCKI, W., CAPONE, L. et al. Effect of the reaction HO2 + O3 → OH + 2O2 on stratospheric ozone. Nature 275, 523–524 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/275523a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/275523a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing