Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Preferential binding of hog brain microtubule-associated proteins to mouse satellite versus bulk DNA preparations

Abstract

MICROTUBULES, as major constituents of the mitotic spindle, have been implicated in chromosome movement. It is not known, however, whether spindle microtubules interact directly with chromosome components. An electron microscopically distinct structure, the kinetochore, has been characterised as the chromosome-associated focus of microtubules that connect the chromosome to the spindle pole (see ref. 1 for review). However, very little is known about the nature of the kinetochore constituents and the possible interaction mechanisms2. We show here that microtubule-associated proteins bind preferentially to satellite DNA sequences in the eukaryotic chromosome.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brinkley, B. R. & Stubblefield, E. Adv. Cell Biol. 1, 119–185 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nicklas, B. R. Adv. Cell Biol. 2, 225–297 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Corces, V. G., Salas, J., Salas, M. L. & Avila, J. Eur. J. Biochem. (in the press).

  4. Corces, V. G. & Avila, J. Eur. J. Biochem. (in the press).

  5. Conolly, J. A., Kalnins, V. I., Cleveland, D. W. & Kirschner, M. W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 2437–2440 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weingarten, M. D., Lockwood, A. H., Hwo, S. Y. & Kirschner, M. W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 1858–1862 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy, D. B. & Borisy, G. G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 2696–2700 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Keates, R. A. B. & Hall, H. R. Nature 257, 418–421 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Southern, E. M. Nature 227, 794–798 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yasmineh, W. G. & Yunis, J. J. Expl Cell Res. 59, 69–75 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yunis, J. J. & Yasmineh, W. G. Science 168, 263–265 1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maio, J J. & Schildkraut, C. L. J. molec. Biol. 40, 203–216 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones, K. W. Nature 225, 912–915 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gillespie, D. – Spiegelman, S. J. molec. Biol. 12, 829–842 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gross-Bellard, M., Oudet, P. & Chambon, P. Eur. J. Biochem. 36, 32–38 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marmur, J. J. molec. Biol. 3, 208–218 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Corneo, G., Ginelli, E., Soave, C. & Bernardi, G. Biochemistry 7, 4347–4379 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Botchan, M., McKenna, G. & Sharp, P. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 38, 383–395 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shelanski, M. L., Gaskin, F. & Cantor, C. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 765–768 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. H., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. J. biol. Chem. 193, 265–275 (1951).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones, D. N. & Berg, P. J. J. molec. Biol. 22, 199–209 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiche, G., Honig, L. S. & Cole, R. D. Nature 269, 435–436 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cleveland, D. W., Hwo, S. Y. & Kirschner, M. W. J. molec. Biol. 116, 207–225 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WICHE, G., CORCES, V. & AVILA, J. Preferential binding of hog brain microtubule-associated proteins to mouse satellite versus bulk DNA preparations. Nature 273, 403–405 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/273403a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/273403a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing