Abstract
PHOTOCHEMICAL pollution in Greater London, as evidenced by unnaturally high ozone concentrations, has been reported on several occasions1–5. In Los Angeles, where photochemical activity has been experienced for many years, an obvious feature of this pollution is aerosol formation, which has been attributed to the participation of SO2 in the photochemical reaction sequence, with subsequent formation of sub-μm sulphate particles6. Although SO2 concentrations are higher in Greater London, there have been no reported measurements of photochemical haze, but Cox and Penkett7, by extrapolation of laboratory measurements of air samples from Harwell, have suggested that a conversion rate of 10% h−1 for SO2 to sulphate aerosol may be possible in Greater London; this would be sufficient to produce large quantities of sulphate aerosol. Identification of such processes is important because evidence suggests that photochemically produced sulphate aerosols can, in certain circumstances, account for a large proportion of total particlate mass in the 0.1–1.0 µm size range8. This size range is important in determining the optical scattering coefficient of polluted air9, and hence visibility, and potentially as a respiratory tract irritant because of its ability to penetrate deeply, in combination with its chemical nature10. We report here preliminary observations based on nephelometric measurements of the optical scattering coefficient of air over central London during June to August 1976, and evidence of haze formation in the London area as educed from the Daily Weather Reports (DWR) of the Meteorological Office (MO), and show how these relate to the occurrence of photochemical processes over Greater London.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Derwent, R. G. & Stewart, H. N. M. Nature 241, 342–343 (1973).
Ball, D. J. Nature 263, 580–582 (1976).
Stewart, H. N. M., Sullivan, E. J. & Williams, M. L. Nature 263, 582–584 (1976).
Apling, A. J. et al. Nature 269, 569–573 (1977).
Ball, D. J. & Bernard, R. E. Atmos. Environ. (in the press) (1978).
Stephens, E. R. & Price, M. A. in Aerosols and Atmospheric Chemistry (ed. Hidy, G. M.) 167–181 (Academic, New York, 1972).
Cox, R. A. & Penkett, S. A. Nature 229, 486–488 (1971).
Charlson, R. J., Vanderpol, A. H., Covert, D. S., Waggoner, A. P. & Ahlquist, N. C. Science 184, 156 (1974).
Waggoner, A. P., Vanderpol, A. J., Charlson, R. J., Larsen, S., Granat, L. & Tragardh, C. Nature 261, 120–122 (1976).
Stevenson, H. J. R., Sanderson, D. E. & Altshuller, A. P. Int. J. Air Wat. Pollut. 9, 367–375 (1965).
Charlson, R. J., Ahlquist, N. C., Selvidge, H. & MacCready, P. B. J. Air Pollut. Control Ass. 19, 937–942 (1969).
Daily Weather Reports (Meteorological Office, Bracknoll).
Wilson, W. E., Miller, D. F., Levy, A. & Stone, R. K. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 23, 949–956 (1973).
White, W. H. et al. Science 194, 187–189 (1976).
Cox, R. A., Eggleton, A. E. J., Derwent, R. G., Lovelock, J. E. & Pack, D. H. Nature 255, 118–121 (1975).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BALL, D., BERNARD, R. Evidence of photochemical haze in the atmosphere of Greater London. Nature 271, 733–734 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/271733a0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/271733a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.