Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Relationship between β converting and γ non-converting corynebacteriophage DNA

Abstract

BACTERIOPHAGE can convert non-toxin producing strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae to toxinogeny, and the significance of the difference between β-tox+ converting corynebacteriophage isolated by Freeman1 and γ-tox non-converting phage isolated in this laboratory2 has been studied sporadically over the past 20 yr. These two phages are serologically related, but are heteroimmune when tested reciprocally against their lysogenic derivatives3. Both phages exhibit similar one-step growth characteristics and patterns of inducibility by ultraviolet light4 and are morphologically similar though differing slightly in head and tail measurements5. The phages recombine vegetatively, though at a frequency lower than in homoimmune β matings6 and also recombine as prophages in tandem double lysogens7. It has been shown8 that γ non-converting phage probably carries a cryptic tox gene, or part of the gene, as matings between β-tox and γ-tox have yielded tox+ recombinants. These data all suggest that there is a high degree of genetic homology between these two phages. To assess this point more directly we have examined DNA heteroduplexes of the phages and DNA fragments produced by various restriction endonucleases. The data show that the two phages are almost identical.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freeman, V. J. J. Bact. 61, 675–688 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Groman, N. B. J. Bact. 69, 9–15 (1955).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Groman, N. B. & Eaton, M. J. Bact. 70, 637–640 (1955).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Groman, N. B., Eaton, M. & Booher, Z. K. J. Bact. 75, 320–325 (1958).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holmes, R. K. & Barksdale, L. J. Virol. 5, 783–794 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Holmes, R. K. & Barksdale, L. J. Virol. 3, 586–598 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Laird, W. & Groman, N. J. Virol. 19, 208–219 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Laird, W. & Groman, N. J. Virol. 19, 220–227 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Groman, N. & Laird, W. J. Virol. 23, 587–591 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Uchida, T., Pappenheimer, Jr. A. M. J. & Greany, R. J. biol. Chem. 248, 3838–3844 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, R. W., Simon, M. & Davidson, N. Methods Enzym. 21, 413–427 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. So, M., Gill, R. & Falkow, S. Molec. gen. Genet. 142, 239–249 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gill, D. M., Uchida, T. & Singer, R. A. Virology 50, 664–668 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lai, C. J. & Northaus, D. J. molec. Biol. 54, 557–565 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lang, D. J. molec. Biol. 54, 557–565 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McDonell, M. W., Simon, M. N. & Studier, F. W. J. molec. Biol. 110, 119–146 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BUCK, G., GROMAN, N. & FALKOW, S. Relationship between β converting and γ non-converting corynebacteriophage DNA. Nature 271, 683–685 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/271683a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/271683a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing