Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Tidal interactions and the massive halo hypothesis

Abstract

THE idea that galaxies may be surrounded by large amounts of unseen material has become very popular. The arguments favouring such massive haloes are almost all based on the dynamical analysis of galaxies either individually or in groups, and they have been cogently assembled by Einasto et al.1 and by Ostriker et al.2. They concluded that galaxies may well be surrounded by large ( 100 kpc) or very large ( 0.5 Mpc) ‘isothermal haloes’ whose mass varies as the radius within which it is measured. (We take H0 = 50 km s−1 Mpc−1). Their views have subsequently received support from Arecibo observations which found flat HI rotation curves to very large radii for several spiral galaxies3, and from analyses of the dynamics of new samples of binary galaxies4 and of groups of galaxies5. The most extreme form of the massive halo hypothesis postulates very large haloes which are the dominant constituent of the Universe, and in which the observed galaxy is little more than contaminating debris left over from the formation of the unseen object6. It is disquieting that there seems to be little chance of direct observation of this dark material, and this letter points out that dynamical constraints can be put on either the extent or the universality of galactic haloes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Einasto, J., Saar, E., Kaasik, A. & Chernin, A. Nature 252, 111–112 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ostriker, J. P., Peebles, P. J. E. & Yahil, A. Astrophys. J. 193, L1–L4 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krumm, N. & Salpeter, E. E. Astr. & Astrophys. 56, 465–468 (1977).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Turner, E. L. Astrophys. J. 208, 20–29 (1976); 208, 304–316 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gott, J. R. & Turner, E. L. Astrophys. J. 213, 309–322 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yahil, A. Astrophys. J. (in the press).

  7. White, S. D. M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 177, 717–733 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Richstone, D. O. Astrophys. J. 200, 535–547 (1975); 204, 642–648 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Albada, T. S. & van Gorkom, J. H. Astr. Astrophys. 54, 121–126 (1977).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WHITE, S., SHARP, N. Tidal interactions and the massive halo hypothesis. Nature 269, 395–396 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/269395a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/269395a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing