Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Cell contact induces an increase in pinocytotic rate in cultured epithelial cells

Abstract

ENDOCYTOSIS is the process by which cells internalise part of the plasma membrane in association with extracellular components; they engulf large particles by phagocytosis and internalise components in the fluid phase by pinocytosis. Discrimination of phagocytosis from pinocytosis has been based on the size of the particle and the amount of energy required to internalise it, phagocytosis being inhibited more readily by metabolic poisons than pinocytosis1–3. This is consistent with the view that more energy is required to internalise a large surface area than is needed for a small surface area. Vasiliev et al.4 described “contact inhibition of phagocytosis”: when cultured epithelial cells, but not fibroblasts, became confluent, the rate of phagocytosis decreased considerably. I report here that confluent cultured epithelial cells are not inhibited in their ability to undergo pinocytosis, but exhibit a greater rate of pinocytosis than do non-confluent cells. This difference is not due to diffusable factors, but is the result of cell contact.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karnovsky, M. L., Physiol. Rev., 42, 143–168 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohn, Z. A., J. exp. Med., 124, 555–571 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Petitpierre-Gabathuler, M. P., and Rhyser, H. J-P., J. Cell Sci., 19, 141–156 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasiliev, S. M., Gelfand, I. M., Domina, L. U., Zacharova, D. S., and Jubimov, L., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 72, 719–722 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Steinman, R. M., and Cohn, Z. A., J. Cell Biol., 55, 186–204 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinman, R. M., Silver, J. M., and Cohn, Z. A., J. Cell Biol., 62, 949–969 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rhyser, H. J. P., Science, 159, 390–396 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan, J., and Moskowitz, M., Biochim. biophys. Acta., 389, 290–305 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DiPasquale, X. X., and Bell, P. B., Jr, J. Cell Biol., 62, 198–214 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J., J. biol. Chem., 193, 652–275 (1951).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KAPLAN, J. Cell contact induces an increase in pinocytotic rate in cultured epithelial cells. Nature 263, 596–597 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/263596a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/263596a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing