Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sensitivity of H–2-less target cells and role of H–2 in T-cell-mediated cytolysis

Abstract

THERE is no definitive teleological interpretation of the involvement of H–2 determinants in the recognition by mouse cytolytic T cells of various non-H–2 antigens1,2. While it is generally believed that T-cell immunity against non-H–2 structures (determined, for example, by infectious agents) may benefit from the known special reactivity of T cells against non-self H–2, other interpretations have been proposed, such as the possibility that H–2 is necessary for cytolysis at a postrecognition stage as the “weak point” of the target-cell surface3. A prediction of this hypothesis is that target cells devoid of H–2 should be resistant to T-cell-mediated cytolysis. We have tested this prediction using male germinal cells, embryonal carcinoma and virus-transformed testicular cells as targets, in the presence of the lectin concanavalin A (con A). Con A binding apparently by-passes4 the normal recognition system, so that lack of recognition of H–2 on H–2-less target cells would not be a limiting factor for cytolysis. We found that H–2-less embryonal carcinoma cell lines, including one with barely detectable levels of F9 antigen, were sensitive to lysis, strongly suggesting that at a postrecognition stage H–2 is not required for T-cell-mediated cytolysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shearer, G. M., Eur. J. Immun., 4, 527–533 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zinkernagel, R. M., and Doherty, P. C., Nature, 248, 701–702 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Forman, J., J. exp. Med., 142, 403–418 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Forman, J., and Möller, G., J. exp. Med., 138, 672–685 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vojtiskova, M., and Pokorna, Z., Folia Biol., 18, 1–9 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fellous, M., Erikson, R., Dubois, P., and Gachelin, G., Folia Biol. (in the press).

  7. Artzt, K., and Jacob, F., Transplantation, 17, 633–634 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Forman, J., and Vitetta, E. S., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 72, 3661–3665 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Artzt, K., et al., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 2988–2992 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Artzt, K., and Bennett, D., Nature, 256, 545–547 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicolas, J. F., Avner, P., Gaillard, J., Jacob, H., and Jacob, F., Cancer Res. (in the press).

  12. Bevan, M. J., and Cohn, M., J. Immun., 114, 559–565 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonavida, B., and Bradley, T. P., Transplantation, 21, 94–102 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Röllinghoff, M., Pfizenmeier, K., Trostmann, H., and Wagner, H., Eur. J. Immun., 5, 560–564 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Golstein, P., and Smith, E. T., Contemp. Topics Immunobiol., 7 (in the press).

  16. Hammerberg, C., and Klein, J., Nature, 258, 296–299 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayer, M. M., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 69, 2954–2958 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Golstein, P., Nature, 252, 81–83 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GOLSTEIN, P., KELLY, F., AVNER, P. et al. Sensitivity of H–2-less target cells and role of H–2 in T-cell-mediated cytolysis. Nature 262, 693–695 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262693a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262693a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing