Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A comparison of acoustic Doppler vertical velocities with direct measurements in the atmospheric boundary layer

Abstract

THE quantitative evaluation of the intensity of acoustic echoes from the first few hundred metres of the atmospheric boundary layer (in both stable and convective situations) has been the subject of much recent experimental work1–5. The acoustic echo, however, contains Doppler information on the vertical air motion and this could prove of great use in the specification of further important boundary layer statistics such as σw2, the variance of the vertical wind speed6 and ɛ, the rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy. Beran et al.7 using a sounder in the monostatic mode (transmitter and receiver aerials located together) derived the profile of the vertical wind component using the acoustic Doppler technique. They did not, however, verify that the estimates of the winds were correct, nor did they record the magnitudes of the Doppler shifts in the weak echo regions between the periods of thermal activity. This paper presents a quantitative comparison between acoustic Doppler vertical winds and direct estimates measured at a fixed height in the atmosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asimakopoulos, D. N., Cole, R. S., Caughey, S. J., Moss, S. H., and Readings, C. J., Atmos. Environ., 9, 775–776 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Asimakopoulos, D. N., Cole, R. S., Caughey, S. J., and Crease, B. A., Boundary Layer Meteorol. (in the press).

  3. Neff, W. D., NOAA Tech. Rep, ERL—322—WPL 38, Boulder, Colorado, (1975).

  4. Haugen, D. A., Kaimal, J. C., and Newman, J. T., AFCRL Instrumentation Paper No. 236, Bedford, Mass, 59 pp (1975).

  5. MacAllister, L. G., J. atm. terr. Phys., 30, 1439–1440 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelton, C., and Bricout, P., Bull. Am. met. Soc., 45, 571–580 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beran, D. W., Little, C. G., and Willmarth, B. C., Nature, 230, 160–162 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Simmons, W. R., Wescott, J. W., and Hall, F. F., Jr, NOAA Tech. Rep. ERL–216–WPL 17, Boulder, Colorado, (1971).

  9. Readings, C. J., and Butler, H. E., Met. Mag., Lond., 101, 286–298 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haugen, D. A., Kaimal, J. C., Readings, C. J., and Rayment, R., J. appl. Met., 14, 540–545 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spizzichino, A., J. geophys. Res, 79, 5585–5591 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Painter, H. E., Met. Mag., Lond., 99, 93–98 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CAUGHEY, S., CREASE, B., ASIMAKOPOULOS, D. et al. A comparison of acoustic Doppler vertical velocities with direct measurements in the atmospheric boundary layer. Nature 262, 274–276 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262274a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262274a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing