Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Plant growth substances and effects of photoperiod on flower bud development in Phaseolus vulgaris

Abstract

THE flower buds of certain varieties of Phaseolus vulgaris absciss in British summers, a phenomenon which is induced when the plants are grown in day lengths longer than 13–14 h1. The number of buds which absciss increases as the day length is extended1–3. This post-initiation effect is truly photoperiodic, the photoperiodic stimulus being received in the leaves and the inhibitory effects expressed in the buds, the growth of which is inhibited before they finally drop2–5. Experiments in which a single trifoliate leaf was exposed to a photoperiod different from the rest of the plant provided indirect evidence that the effects of photoperiod on flower bud development were mediated through the production of substances in the leaves, with a predominance of inhibitor(s) being formed in long days and of promoter(s) in short days3,4. We describe here the determination in a single sensitive variety, classified as P47, of the chemical basis for the inhibitory and promotory effects of long and short days respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ojehomon, O. O., Rathjen, A. S., and Morgan, D. G., J. agric. Sci., 71, 209–214 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zehni, M. S., and Morgan, D. G., Ann. Bot. (in the press).

  3. Zehni, M. S., thesis, Univ. Cambridge (1969).

  4. Zehni, M. S., Saad, F. A., and Morgan, D. G., Nature, 227, 628–629 (1970).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ojehomon, O. O., Zehni, M. S., and Morgan, D. G., Ann. Bot., 37, 871–884 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bentley, B., thesis, Univ. Cambridge (1974).

  7. Milborrow, B. V., J. exp. Bot., 21, 17–29 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright, S. T. C., Planta, 86, 10–20 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lenton, J. R., Perry, V. M., and Saunders, P. F., Planta, 96, 271–280 (1971).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saad, F. A., thesis, Univ. Cambridge (1972).

  11. Heide, O. M., and Skoog, F., Physiol. Plant., 20, 771–780 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Woolhouse, H. W., and Beever, J. E., Nature new Biol., 246, 31–32 (1973).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Evans, L. T., Induction of Flowering—some Case Histories (Macmillan, Melbourne 1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BENTLEY, B., MORGAN, C., MORGAN, D. et al. Plant growth substances and effects of photoperiod on flower bud development in Phaseolus vulgaris. Nature 256, 121–122 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/256121a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/256121a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing