Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Manuscript
  • Published:

Leukemia Genomics

Genomic gains and losses influence expression levels of genes located within the affected regions: a study on acute myeloid leukemias with trisomy 8, 11, or 13, monosomy 7, or deletion 5q

Abstract

We performed microarray analyses in AML with trisomies 8 (n=12), 11 (n=7), 13 (n=7), monosomy 7 (n=9), and deletion 5q (n=7) as sole changes to investigate whether genomic gains and losses translate into altered expression levels of genes located in the affected chromosomal regions. Controls were 104 AML with normal karyotype. In subgroups with trisomy, the median expression of genes located on gained chromosomes was higher, while in AML with monosomy 7 and deletion 5q the median expression of genes located in deleted regions was lower. The 50 most differentially expressed genes, as compared to all other subtypes, were equally distributed over the genome in AML subgroups with trisomies. In contrast, 30 and 86% of the most differentially expressed genes characteristic for AML with 5q deletion and monosomy 7 are located on chromosomes 5 or 7. In conclusion, gain of whole chromosomes leads to overexpression of genes located on the respective chromosomes. Losses of larger regions of the genome translate into lower expression of the majority of genes represented by only one allele. The reduced expression of these genes is the most characteristic difference in gene expression profiles between AML with monosomy 7 and AML with deletion 5q, respectively, and other AML subtypes. Therefore, these data provide evidence that gene dosage effects gene expression in AML with unbalanced karyotype abnormalities. Losses of specific regions of the genome determine the gene expression profile more strongly than the gain of whole chromosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schoch C, Haferlach T, Bursch S, Gerstner D, Schnittger S, Dugas M et al. Loss of genetic material is more common than gain in acute myeloid leukemia with complex aberrant karyotype: a detailed analysis of 125 cases using conventional chromosome analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization including 24-color FISH. Genes, Chromosomes Cancer 2002; 35: 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Virtaneva K, Wright FA, Tanner SM, Yuan B, Lemon WJ, Caligiuri MA et al. Expression profiling reveals fundamental biological differences in acute myeloid leukemia with isolated trisomy 8 and normal cytogenetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 1124–1129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schoch C, Schnittger S, Bursch S, Gerstner D, Hochhaus A, Berger U et al. Comparison of chromosome banding analysis, interphase- and hypermetaphase-FISH, qualitative and quantitative PCR for diagnosis and for follow-up in chronic myeloid leukemia: a study on 350 cases. Leukemia 2002; 16: 53–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schoch C, Kohlmann A, Schnittger S, Brors B, Dugas M, Mergenthaler S et al. Acute myeloid leukemias with reciprocal rearrangements can be distinguished by specific gene expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 10008–10013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kohlmann A, Schoch C, Schnittger S, Dugas M, Hiddemann W, Kern W et al. Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) gene expression signatures classify an independent cohort of adult ALL patients. Leukemia 2004; 18: 63–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Altmann DG . Practical statistics for medical research. London: CRC Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Seidman JG, Seidman C . Transcription factor haploinsufficiency: when half a loaf is not enough. J Clin Invest 2002; 109: 451–455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Santarosa M, Ashworth A . Haploinsufficiency for tumour suppressor genes: when you don't need to go all the way. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004; 1654: 105–122.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Largaespada DA . Haploinsufficiency for tumor suppression: the hazards of being single and living a long time. J Exp Med 2001; 193: F15–F18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Venkatachalam S, Shi Y-P, Jones SN, Vogel H, Bradley A, Pinkel D et al. Retentio of wild-type p53 in tumore from p53 heterozygous mice: reduction of p53 dosage can promote cancer formation. EMBO J 1998; 17: 4657–4667.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schoch C, Haase D, Fonatsch C, Haferlach T, Löffler H, Schlegelberger B et al. The significance of trisomy 8 in de novo acute myeloid leukaemia: the accompanying chromosome aberrations determine the prognosis. Br J Haematol 1997; 99: 605–611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoch C, Schnittger S, Klaus M, Kern W, Hiddemann W, Haferlach T . AML with 11q23/MLL abnormalities as defined by the WHO classification: incidence, partner chromosomes, FAB subtype, age distribution, and prognostic impact in an unselected series of 1897 cytogenetically analyzed AML cases. Blood 2003; 102: 2395–2402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Schoch.

Additional information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Leukemia website (http://www.nature.com/leu).

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoch, C., Kohlmann, A., Dugas, M. et al. Genomic gains and losses influence expression levels of genes located within the affected regions: a study on acute myeloid leukemias with trisomy 8, 11, or 13, monosomy 7, or deletion 5q. Leukemia 19, 1224–1228 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403810

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403810

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links