Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Manuscript
  • Published:

Chemotherapy only compared to chemotherapy followed by transplantation in high risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia; two parallel studies adjusted for various prognostic factors

Abstract

Comparisons of the effectiveness of chemotherapy and transplantation in AML in first complete remission (CR) have focused almost exclusively on patients with de novo disease. Here we used Cox modelling to compare these strategies in patients with MDS and s-AML treated by the Leukemia Group of the EORTC or at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. All patients were aged 15–60. The 184 EORTC patients received conventional dose ara-C + idarubicin + etoposide for remission induction, and after one consolidation course, were scheduled to receive an allograft, or an autograft if a sibling donor was unavailable. The 215 MDA patients received various high-dose ara-C containing induction regimens, and in CR, continued to receive these regimens at reduced dose for 6–12 months. CR rates were 54% EORTC and 63% MDA (P = 0.09). Sixty-five of the 100 EORTC patients who entered CR received a transplant in first CR. Disease-free survival in patients achieving CR was superior in the EORTC cohort, the 4-years DFS rates were 28.9% (s.e. = 4.8%) EORTC vs 17.3% (s.e. = 3.7%) MDA (P = 0.017). Survival from CR was not significantly different in the EORTC and MDA groups, as was survival from start of treatment. After accounting for prognostic factors the conclusions were unchanged. Despite various problems with the analysis discussed below, the data suggest that neither transplantation nor chemotherapy, as currently practised, can be unequivocally recommended for these patients in first CR and that questions as to the superior modality may be less important than the need to improve results with both.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenberg P, Cox C, Le Beau M, Fenaux P, Morel P, Sanz G, Sanz M, Vallespi T, Hamblin T, Oscier D, Ohyashiki K, Toyama K, Aul C, Mufti G, Bennett J . International Scoring System for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. [Erratum Blood 1998; 91: 1100] Blood 1997 89: 2079–2088

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Preisler HD, Raza M, Barcos M, Azarnia N, Larson R, Browman G, Walker I, Grunwald H, D'Arrigo P, Stein A, Bloom M, Goldberg J, Gottlieb A, Bennett J, Kirshner J, Priore R . High-dose cytosine arabinoside in the treatment of preleukemic disorders: a leukemia intergroup study Am J Hematol 1986 23: 131–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Witte T, Muus P, De Pauw B, Haanen C . Intensive antileukemic treatment of patients younger than 65 years with myelodysplastic syndromes and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia Cancer 1990 66: 831–837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Witte T, Suciu S, Peetermans M, Fenaux P, Strijckmans P, Hayat M, Jaksic B, Selleslag D, Zittoun R, Dardenne M, Solbu G, Zwierzina H, Muus P . Intensive chemotherapy for poor prognosis myelodysplasia (MDS) and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia following MDS of more than 6 months duration. A pilot study by the Leukemia Cooperative Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC-LCG) Leukemia 1985 9: 1805–1811

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zittoun RA, Mandelli F, Willemze R, De Witte T, Labar B, Resegotti L, Leoni F, Damasio E, Visani G, Papa G, Caronia F, Hayat M, Stryckmans P, Rotoli B, Leoni P, Peetermans ME, Dardenne M, Vegna ML, Petti MC, Solbu G, Suciu S . Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia N Engl J Med 1995 332: 217–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harousseau JL, Cahn JY, Pignon B, Witz F, Milpied N, Delain M, Lioure B, Lamy T, Desablens B, Guilhot F, Caillot D, Abgrall JF, Francois S, Briere J, Guyotat D, Casassus P, Audhey B, Tellier Z, Hurteloup P, Herve P . Comparison of autologous bone marrow transplantation and intensive chemotherapy as postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia Blood 1997 90: 2978–2986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnett AK, Goldstone AH, Stevens RM, Hann IM, Rees JK, Gray RG, Wheatley K . Randomised comparison of addition of autologous bone-marrow transplantation to intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: results of MRC AML 10 trial Lancet 1998 351: 700–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Witte T, Zwaan F, Hermans J, Vernant J, Kolb H, Vossen J, Lönnqvist B, Beelen D, Ferrant A, Gmür J, Liu Yin J, Troussard X, Cahn J, Van Lint M, Gratwohl A . Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for secondary leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a survey by the Leukemia Working Party of the European Bone Marrrow Transplantation Group (EBMTG) Br J Haematol 1990 74: 151–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sutton L, Leblond V, Le Maignan C, Jouet JP, Kuentz M, Gluckman E, Blaise D, Marit G, Attal M, Troussard X, Pordigoni P, Cahn JY, Ribaud P . Bone marrow transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary leukemia: outcome of 86 patients Bone Marrow Transplant 1991 7 (Suppl. 2): 39

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nevill TJ, Shepherd JD, Reece DE, Barnett MJ, Nantel SH, Klingeman HG, Philips GL . Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome with busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning followed by allogeneic BMT Bone Marrow Transplant 1992 10: 445–450

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson JE, Appelbaum FR, Fisher LD, Schoch G, Shulman H, Anasetti C, Bensinger WI, Bryant E, Buckner CD, Doney K, Martin PJ, Sanders JE, Sullivan KM, Donnall Thomas E, Witherspoon RP, Hansen JA, Storb R . Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for 93 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome Blood 1993 82: 677–681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson JE, Appelbaum FR, Storb R . An update on allogeneic marrow transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome Leuk Lymphoma 1995 17: 95–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laporte JP, Isnard F, Lesage S, Fenaux P, Douay L, Lopez M, Stacowiak J, Najman A, Gorin NC . Autologous bone marrow transplantation with marrow purged by mafosfamide in seven patients with myelodysplastic syndromes in transformation (AML-MDS): a pilot study Leukemia 1993 7: 2030–2033

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Witte T, Van Biezen A, Hermans J, Labopin M, Runde V, Or R, Meloni G, Mauri SB, Carella A, Apperley J, Gratwohl A, Laporte JP . Autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia following MDS Blood 1997 90: 3853–3857

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Witte T, Suciu S, Verhoef G, Labar B, Archimbaud E, Aul C, Selleslag D, Ferrant A, Wijermans P, Mandelli F, Amadori S, Jehn U, Muus P, De Muynck H, Dardenne M, Zittoun R, Willemze R, Gratwohl A, Apperley J . Autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with poor risk MDS and secondary AML (sAML) A joint study of the EORTC, EBMT, SAKK and GIMEMA leukemia groups (#2594) Blood 1997 90 (Suppl 1): 583a (Abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Witte T, Suciu S, Verhoef G, Labar B, Archimbaud E, Aul C, Selleslag D, Ferrant A, Wijermans P, Mandelli F, Amadori S, Jehn U, Muus P, Boogaerts M, Zittoun R, Gratwohl A, Zwierzina H, Hagemeijer A, Willemze R . Intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and acute myeloid leukemia following MDS (AML-MDS) Blood 2001 98: 2326–2331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DAG, Gralnick HR, Sultan C . Proposals for the classification of the acute leukemias (FAB cooperative group) Br J Haematol 1976 33: 451–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MD, Flandrin G, Galton DAG, Gralnick HR, Sultan C (FAB cooperative group). proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes Br J Haematol 1982 51: 189–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cason JD, Trujillo JM, Huh YO, Freireich EJ, Stass SA . Peripheral acute leukemia: high peripheral but low-marrow blast count Blood 1989 74: 1758–1761

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitelman F (ed). ISCN (1995): An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature Karger: Basel 1995

    Google Scholar 

  21. Estey EH, Shen Y, Thall PH . Effect of time to complete remission on subsequent survival and disease-free survival time in AML, RAEBt and RAEB Blood 2000 95: 72–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cox DR, Oakes D . Analysis of Survival Data Chapman and Hall: London 1984

    Google Scholar 

  23. Collet D . Modeling Binary Data Chapman and Hall: London 1991

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Mufti GJ, Stevens JR, Oscier DG, Hamblin TJ, Machin D . Myelodysplastic syndromes: a scoring system with prognostic significance Br J Haematol 1985 59: 425–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Worsley A, Oscier DG, Stevens J, Figes A, Mufti GJ, Hamblin TJ . Prognostic features of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a modified Bournemouth score gives the best prediction of survival Br J Haematol 1988 68: 17–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanz GF, Sanz MA, Vallespi T, Canizo MC, Torrabadella M, Garcia S, Irriguible D, San Miguel JF . Two regression models and a scoring system for predicting survival and planning treatment in myelodysplastic syndromes: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in 370 patients Blood 1989 74: 395–408

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morel P, Hebbar M, Lai JL, Duhamel A, Preudhomme C, Wattel E, Bauters F, Fenaux P . Cytogenetic analysis has strong independent prognostic value in de novo myelodysplastic syndromes and can be incorporated in a new scoring system: a report on 408 cases Leukemia 1993 7: 1315–1323

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morel P, Declercq C, Hebbar M, Bauters F, Fenaux P . Prognostic factors in myelodysplastic syndromes: critical analysis of the impact of age and gender and failure to identify a very-low-risk group using standard mortality ratio techniques Br J Haematol 1996 94: 116–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pfeilstocker M, Reisner R, Nosslinger T, Gruner H, Nowotny H, Tuchler H, Schlogl E, Pitterman E, Heinz R . Cross-validation of prognostic scores in myelodysplastic syndromes on 386 patients from a single institution confirms importance of cytogenetics Br J Haematol 1999 106: 455–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vardiman JW . WHO histological classification of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferatieve diseases In: Jaffe ES, Lee Harris N, Stein H, Vardiman JW (eds) World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics. Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues IARC Press: Lyon 2001 pp 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bishop JF, Matthews JP, Young GA, Szer J, Gillett A, Joshua D, Bradstock K, Enno A, Wolf MM, Fox R . A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia Blood 1996 87: 1710–1717

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J Cortes is a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar in Clinical Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oosterveld, M., Muus, P., Suciu, S. et al. Chemotherapy only compared to chemotherapy followed by transplantation in high risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia; two parallel studies adjusted for various prognostic factors. Leukemia 16, 1615–1621 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2402591

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2402591

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links