Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Somatic Pairing, Reduction and Recombination: An Evolutionary Hypothesis of Meiosis

Abstract

WITH the development of the concept that meaningful pairing of homologous chromosomes and crossing over occur only during meiotic prophase has come a series of reports of somatic pairing of homologous chromosomes in the Diptera1,2 and in Yucca3. Additional examples are random or predictable cases of metaphase and anaphase chromosome pairing and interphase-paired prochromosomes in flowering plants3,4 and in spermatogonia of various animals5,6. In some cases prochromosome reduction by pairing of presumed homologues occurs in tissues seen to have somatic pairing during mitosis7,9. The intimate association of homologous prochromosomes during interphase implies synapsis of euchromatic regions. Giant, interphase chromosomes of many Diptera are also synapsed during interphase. The occurrence of somatic recombination in fungi10 and in the flowering plant Arabidopsis11 (which evidently has somatic pairing throughout12) also indicates intimate interphase synapsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metz, C. W., J. Exp. Zool., 21, 213 (1916).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sonnenblick, B. P., in Biology of Drosophila (edit. by Demerec, M.) (Wiley, London, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Watkins, G. M., Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 62, 133 (1935).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Digby, L., Ann. Bot., 24, 727 (1910).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, S. G., Canad. J. Res., 20D, 221 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore, J. E. S., and Embleton, A. L., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 77, 55 (1906).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chauhn, K. P. S., and Abel, W. D., Chromosoma, 25, 297 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stack, S. M., and Brown, W. V., Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 96, 143 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guyénot, E., and Naville, A., Cellule, 42, 213 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holliday, R., Genet. Res., 6, 104 (1965).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirono, Y., and Rédei, G. P., Genetics, 51, 519 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Steinitz-Sears, L. M., Genetics, 48, 483 (1963).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Grell, R. F., Intern. Symp. Genes and Chromosomes (US Govt Print. Office, Washington, DC, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feldman, M., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 55, 1447 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maguire, M. P., Genetics, 53, 1071 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown, W. V., and Stack, S. M., Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 95, 369 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maguire, M. P., Chromosoma, 21, 221 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leblond, C. P., and Clermont, Y., Amer. J. Anat., 90, 167 (1952).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stern, C., Genetics, 21, 625 (1936).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Le Clerc, G., Science, 102, 553 (1946).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roper, J. A., in The Fungi, II (edit. by Ainsworth, G. C., and Sussman, A. S.), 589 (Academic Press, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Westergaard, M. C. R., Trav. Lab. Carlsberg, 34, 359 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, P. A., and King, R. C., Genetics, 60, 335 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lewis, E. B., Amer. Zool., 3, 33 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singleton, J. R., Amer. J. Bot., 40, 124 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rossen, J. M., and Westergaard, M., CR Trav. Lab. Carlsberg, 35, 233 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

STACK, S., BROWN, W. Somatic Pairing, Reduction and Recombination: An Evolutionary Hypothesis of Meiosis. Nature 222, 1275–1276 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/2221275a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2221275a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing