Abstract
DR. NEGI'S criticism seems to have been based on a misreading of the purpose of our communication1. What we actually meant to convey was that the average radial gravity ḡ(r), expressed in Taylor's expansion or in any of its allied forms, cannot always be accepted in view of its oscillatory character. Thus such representation should be made with some caution and only below a certain range of radius, depending on the depth of the body and the location of the point of measurement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Rao, B. S. R., and Radhakrishnamurty, I. V., Nature, 206, 179 (1965).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RAO, B. Convergence and Divergence in Gravity and Magnetic Interpretation. Nature 210, 617 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/210617a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/210617a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.