Abstract
RECENTLY, many attempts have been made to isolate the intellectual and personal qualities which enable people to do original work, particularly in science. One of the most interesting results so far is Getzels and Jackson's1 discovery of the “High Creative” type among American school-children. (These are children who are successful academically, whose intelligence quotients are relatively low, but who excel in open-ended tests—for example, “How many uses can you think of for each of the following objects?”) The contrast between “High Creative” and “High Intelligence Quotient” types is seen to support a more general distinction between ‘divergent’ and ‘convergent’ styles of thinking, the former—it is argued—being the style which leads to original work among adults.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Getzels, J. W., and Jackson, P. W., Creativity and Intelligence (Wiley, New York, 1962).
Hudson, L., Nature, 186, 413 (1960).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HUDSON, L. Intelligence, Divergence and Potential Originality. Nature 196, 601–602 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/196601a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/196601a0
This article is cited by
-
Teacher Attitudes to Projects in A-Level Engineering Science
Nature (1972)
-
Teleonomic Teaching and the Supply of Biologists
Nature (1965)
-
A General Theory for the Evolution of Intelligent Behaviour
Nature (1965)
-
Future Open Scholars
Nature (1964)
-
Personality and Scientific Aptitude
Nature (1963)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.