Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Origin of the Common Wild Oat, Avena fatua L.

An Erratum to this article was published on 21 July 1956

Abstract

IT is generally considered that differentiation of the hexaploid species of oats has resulted primarily from structural changes and gene mutations involving a small group of chromosomes more or less common to all the species. The different species hybridize readily, giving highly fertile progenies, which indicates considerable homology of the chromosomes of any one species with the others. Indeed, it would be difficult to discover a closer chromosome affinity in any group of polyploids than that indicated by Nishiyama1 for the four hexaploid oat species Avena byzantina, A. fatua, A. sterilis and A. sativa. With complete affinity between any two species represented as 1.000 and no affinity as 0.000, values obtained by Nishiyama from crosses involving the above-mentioned species ranged from 0.983 to 0.998. More recently, however, cytological studies conducted by Joshi and Howard2 show that meiotic irregularities are found in fairly high frequencies in hybrids with A. byzantina as one parent, which implies that at least some of the corresponding chromosomes of the various species are not completely homologous.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nishiyama, I., Jap. J. Genet., 5, 1 (1929).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Joshi, A. B., and Howard, H. W., J. Agric. Sci., 46, Pt. 2, 183 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haussknecht, C., Mitt. Geogt. Gessel. Jena, 3, 231 (1885).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thellung, Von A., Vjschr Natur. Gessel., Zurich, 56, 293 (1912).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coffman, F. A., J. Amer. Soc. Agron., 38, 983 (1946).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vavilov, N. I., Bull. App. Bot. and Plant Breed., 17 (2), 139 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Malzew, A. I., Bull. App. Bot., Leningrad, 38, Supp. (English translation, 473) (1930).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GRIFFITHS, D., JOHNSTON, T. Origin of the Common Wild Oat, Avena fatua L.. Nature 178, 99–100 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1038/178099a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/178099a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing