Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern

Abstract

After adaptation of the visual system to motion of a pattern in a particular direction, a static pattern appears to move in the opposite direction—the motion aftereffect (MAE)1,2. It is thought that the MAE is not accompanied by a shift in perceived spatial position of the pattern being viewed3,4, providing psychophysical evidence for a dissociation of the neural processing of motion and position that complements anatomical and physiological evidence of functional specialization in primate and human visual cortex5,6,7. However, here we measure the perceived orientation of a static windmill pattern after adaptation to rotary motion and find a gradual shift in orientation in the direction of the illusory rotation, though at a rate much lower than the apparent rotation speed. The orientation shift, which started to decline within a few seconds, could persist longer than the MAE, and disappeared when the MAE was nulled by physical motion of the windmill pattern. Our results indicate that the representation of the position of spatial pattern is dynamically updated by neurons involved in the analysis of motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Experiment 1.
Figure 2: Experiment 2.
Figure 3: Experiment 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wohlgemuth, A. On the aftereffect of seen movement. Br. J. Psychol. Monogr. Suppl. 1, 1–117 (1911).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mather, G., Verstraten, F. A. J. & Anstis, S. M. The Motion Aftereffect: A Modern Perspective (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, (1998)).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gregory, R. L. Eye and Brain (McGraw-Hill, New York, (1966)).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nakayama, K. Biological image motion processing: a review. Vision Res. 25, 625–660 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeki, S. M. Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 236, 549–573 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zihl, J., VonCramon, D. & Mai, N. Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. Brain 106, 313–340 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Livingstone, M. S. & Hubel, D. H. Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. J. Neurosci. 7, 3416–3466 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Snowden, R. J. Perceived spatial position is altered by motion adaptation. Perception 27 (Suppl.), 49–50 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Spigel, I. M. The effects of differential post exposure illumination on the decay of a movement aftereffect. J. Psychol. 50, 209–210 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramachandran, V. S. & Anstis, S. M. Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edges. Perception 19, 611–616 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. De Valois, R. L. & De Valois, K. K. Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Res. 31, 1619–1626 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nijhawan, R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370, 256–267 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baldo, M. V. C. & Klein, S. A. Extrapolation or attentional shift. Nature 378, 565–566 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Khurana, B. & Nijhawan, R. Extrapolation or attentional shift: reply. Nature 378, 566 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Anstis, S. M. & Remachandran, V. S. in The Artful Eye (eds Gregory, R., Harris, J., Heard, P. & Rose, D.) 232–248 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, (1995)).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merigan, W. H. & Maunsell, J. H. R. How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 369–402 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeki, S. A Vision of the Brain (Blackwell, Oxford, (1993)).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shipp, S. & Zeki, S. The organisation of connections between areas V1 and V5 in the macaque monkey visual cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1, 309–332 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shipp, S. & Zeki, S. The organisation of connections between areas V2 and V5 in the macaque monkey visual cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1, 333–354 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.N. was a visiting fellow at the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL. We thank S. Naito and K. Ishii, NTT Communication Science Laboratories for their support. A.J. is supported by a grant from the EPSRC/BBSRC Mathematical Modelling Initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Johnston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nishida, S., Johnston, A. Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature 397, 610–612 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/17600

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/17600

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing