Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:

Graft-versus-tumour effect in refractory metastatic neuroblastoma

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  1. Champlin R, Khouri I, Shimoni A, Gajewski J, Kornblau S, Molldrem J et al. Harnessing graft-versus-malignancy: non-myeloablative preparative regimens for allogeneic haematopoietic transplantation, an evolving strategy for adoptive immunotherapy. Br J Haematol 2000; 111: 18–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Childs R, Chernoff A, Contentin N, Bahceci E, Schrump D, Leitman S et al. Regression of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma after nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 750–758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanda Y, Komatsu Y, Akahane M, Kojima S, Asano-Mori Y, Tada M et al. Graft-versus-tumor effect against advanced pancreatic cancer after allogeneic reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation. Transplantation 2005; 79: 821–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tchirkov A, Kanold J, Combaret V, Philip I, Kwiatkowski F, Malet P et al. Immunological and molecular detection of tumor contamination in leukapheresis products from children with disseminated neuroblastoma: implication for evaluation of tumor cell depletion after CD34 selection. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 24: 229–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reynolds CP . Detection and treatment of minimal residual disease in high-risk neuroblastoma. Pediatr Transplant 2004; 8 (Suppl 5): 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinmetz HT, Schulz A, Staib P, Scheid C, Glasmacher A, Neufang A et al. Phase-II trial of idarubicin, fludarabine, cytosine arabinoside, and filgrastim (Ida-FLAG) for treatment of refractory, relapsed, and secondary AML. Ann Hematol 1999; 78: 418–425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleischhack G, Hasan C, Graf N, Mann G, Bode U . IDA-FLAG (idarubicin, fludarabine, cytarabine, G-CSF), an effective remission-induction therapy for poor-prognosis AML of childhood prior to allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation: experiences of a phase II trial. Br J Haematol 1998; 102: 647–655.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Marabelle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marabelle, A., Paillard, C., Tchirkov, A. et al. Graft-versus-tumour effect in refractory metastatic neuroblastoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 39, 809–810 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705681

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705681

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links