Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Chimerism

Platelet chimerism by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) utilizing variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) in allogeneic stem cell transplant in children: a new novel approach to full chimerism analysis

Summary:

Evaluation of chimerism following allogeneic transplantation has been performed traditionally focusing on two cellular compartments, namely lymphoid and myeloid. However, none has been described so far to evaluate platelet chimerism. In order to achieve full chimerism in all three cellular compartments, we prospectively obtained 138 samples of peripheral blood in 55 patients at different post transplant periods following allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Evaluation of chimerism was performed utilizing tests of variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) and sex determination by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Tests for platelet chimerism using platelet-rich plasma were simultaneously analyzed with samples for T-cell lymphoid and myeloid compartments. Complete donor chimerism was noted in 49 of 55 patients (89%), while the remaining six have split chimerism ranging from 34 to 98%. There is significant difference (P=0.0004) between the percentages of donor DNA in all three cellular compartments comparing the means±s.e.m. (myeloid 95.60±0.9, T-cell lymphocytes 87.6±1.9, and the platelets 90.8±1.5); however, comparison between the medians is not statistically significant. This study represents an additional step towards achieving full chimerism and the observation may help reduce the number of unnecessary platelet transfusions once chimerism is noted in that cellular compartment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antin JH, Childs R, Filipovich AII et al. Establishment of complete and mixed donor chimerism after allogeneic lymphohematopoietic transplantation: recommendations from a workshop at the 2001 tandem meetings. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2001; 7: 473–485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang LJ, Chou P, Gonzalez-Ryan L et al. Evaluation of mixed chimerism in pediatric patients with leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation by quantitative PCR analysis of variable number of tandem repeat and testis determination gene. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 29: 51–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bader P, Frey A, Schlegel PG et al. Serial and quantitative analysis of mixed hematopoietic chimerism by PCR in patients with acute leukemias allows the prediction of relapse after allogeneic BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21: 487–495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bader P, Holle W, Klingebiel T et al. Mixed hematopoietic chimerism after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: the impact of quantitative PCR analysis for prediction of relapse and graft rejection in children. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 19: 697–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang J, Zhang W . Variable number of tandem repeats as an evidence of engraftment status after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Zhongua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2000; 80: 823–825.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mackinnon S, Barnett L, Bourhis P et al. Myeloid and lymphoid chimerism after T cell depleted bone marrow transplantation: evaluation of conditioning regimens using the polymerase chain reaction to amplify human minisatelite regions of genomic DNA. Blood 1992; 80: 3235–3324.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roux E, Helg C, Chapu B et al. Evolution of mixed chimerism after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as determined on granulocytes and mononuclear cells by the polymerase chain reaction. Blood 1992; 79: 2775–2783.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perez-Simon JA, Caballero D, Diez-Campelo M et al. Chimerism and minimal residual disease monitoring after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic transplantation. Leukemia 2002; 16: 1423–1431.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawler M, McCann SR, Conneally E, Humphries P . Chimerism following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: detection of residual host cells using the polymerase chain reaction. Br J Haematol 1989; 73: 205–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shimoni A, Nagler A, Kaplinsky C et al. Chimerism testing and detection of minimal residual disease after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation using the bioview (duet) combined morphological and cytogenetical analysis. Leukemia 2002; 16: 1413–1418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beck JF, Klingebiel T, Kreyenberg H et al. Relapse of childhood ALL, AML and MDS after allogeneic stem cell transplantation can be prevented by donor lymphocyte infusion in a critical stage of increasing mixed chimerism. Klin Pafiatr 2002; 214: 201–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mapara MY, Kim YM, Wang SP et al. Donor lymphocyte infusions mediate superior graft-versus-leukemia effects in mixed compared to fully allogeneic chimeras: a critical role for host antigen-presenting cells. Blood 2002; 100: 1903–1909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaiger A, Mannhalter C, Hinterberger W et al. Detection of engraftment and mixed chimerism following bone marrow transplantation using PCR amplification of a highly variable region-variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) in the von Willebrand factor gene. Ann Hematol 1991; 63: 227–228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill RS, Petersen FB, Storb R et al. Mixed hematologic chimerism after allogeneic marrow transplantation for severe aplastic anemia is associated with a higher risk of graft rejection and a lessened incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood 1986; 67: 811–816.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Casado LF, Steegman JL, Pico M et al. Study of chimerism in long-term survivors after bone marrow transplantation for severe acquired aplastic anemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 18: 405–409.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Figuerres E, Olszewski M, Kletzel M . A flow cytometric technique using thiazole orange to detect platelet engraftment following pediatric stem-cell transplants. Cytometry 2001; 3: 277–283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Nasser KE, Matthew J, Thomas N, Fatania HR . Analysis of the DIS80 (pMCT118) VNTR locus polymorphism in a native Kuwaiti population by the polymerase chain reaction. Forensic Sci Inst 1996; 78: 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Horn GT, Richards B, Klinger KW . Amplification of a highly polymorphic VNTR segment by the polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res 1989; 17: 2140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cui KH, Warnes Gm, Jeffrery R, Matthews CD . Sex determination of preimplantation embryos by human testis-determining gene amplification. Lancet 1994; 343: 79–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pugatsch T, Oppenheim A, Slavin S . Improved single-step PCR assay for sex identification post-allogeneic sex-mismatched BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17: 273–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P M Chou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chou, P., Olszewski, M., Huang, W. et al. Platelet chimerism by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) utilizing variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) in allogeneic stem cell transplant in children: a new novel approach to full chimerism analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant 32, 825–828 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704236

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704236

Keywords

Search

Quick links