Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Parenteral Nutrition

Total parenteral nutrition vs oral diet in autologous hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

Summary:

Autologous HCT patients often have poor oral intake for 2–4 weeks post transplant. To compare outcomes between patients provided prophylactic total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or an oral diet (OD), 55 well nourished breast cancer/ hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients were randomized to TPN (n=27), beginning day −1, or OD (n=28). Parameters studied include length of stay (LOS), engraftment, infections, survival, weight, anthropometrics, handgrip strength, and quality of life (QOL) In all, 50% of OD patients were given TPN due to poor oral intake for 10 consecutive days. No significant differences were found between the groups for any of the above parameters except weight and anthropometrics, which were better maintained in the TPN group than the OD group. Trends were seen for increased infections, more stable handgrip strength, and improved QOL in the TPN group vs the OD group. Prophylactic TPN did result in a more intact nutritional status and preservation of lean body mass post transplant but did not impact LOS or survival when compared to OD. For this reason, TPN should be reserved for autologous HCT patients with pretransplant nutritional depletion, complications post transplant, or prolonged poor oral intake. These results should not be extrapolated to allogeneic HCT patients but are likely applicable to other well nourished autologous HCT patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aker SN . Bone marrow transplantation: nutrition support and monitoring. In: Bloch AS (ed.). Nutrition Management of the Cancer Patient. Aspen Publishers: Rockville, MD, 1990, pp 199–225.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herrmann VM, Petruska PJ . Nutrition support in bone marrow transplant recipients. Nutr Clin Pract 1993; 8: 19–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weisdorf SA, Schwarzenberg SJ . Nutritional support of bone marrow transplant recipients. In: Forman SJ, Blume KG, Thomas ED (eds). Bone Marrow Transplantation. Blackwell Scientific Publications: Boston, MA, 1994, pp 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weisdorf SA, Lysne J, Wind D et al. Positive effect of prophylactic total parenteral nutrition on long-term outcome of bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 1987; 43: 833–838.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dicato M . High-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer: where are we now? Semin Oncol 2002; 29: 16–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baynes RD, Dansey RD, Klein JL et al. High-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for breast cancer: past or future? Semin Oncol 2001; 28: 377–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carella AM, Beltrami C, Lerma E et al. Combined use of autografting and non-myeloablative allografting for the treatment of hematologic malignancies and metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Treat Res 2002; 110: 101–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pecora AL, Lazarus HM, Stadtmauer EA et al. Effect of induction chemotherapy and tandem cycles of high-dose chemotherapy on outcomes in autologous stem cell transplant for metastatic breast cancer. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 27: 1245–1253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamwi GJ . Changing dietary concepts. In: Danowski TS (ed.). Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnosis and Treatment, American Diabetes Association, Inc.: New York, Vol. 1, 1964, pp 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harris JA, Benedict FG . A Biometric Study of Basal Metabolism in Man. Publication No. 279. Carnegie Institute: Washington, DC, 1919.

  11. Kushner RF, Wall-Alonso E, Alverdy J . Obesity. In: Merritt RJ (ed.). The A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Practice Manual. A.S.P.E.N.: Silver Springs, MD, 1998, pp 21/1–21/11.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor SE, Lichtman RR, Wood JV et al. Illness-related and treatment-related factors in psychological adjustment to breast cancer. Cancer 1985; 55: 2506–2513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor SE, Lichtman RR, Wood JV et al. Breast self-examination among diagnosed breast cancer patients. Cancer 1984; 54: 2528–2532.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF . Edits Manual for the Profile of Mood States. EdITS/Educational and Industrial Testing Service: San Diego, CA, 1992, p 23.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Szeluga DJ, Stuart RK, Brookmeyer R et al. Nutritional support of bone marrow transplant recipients: randomized clinical trial comparing total parenteral nutrition to an enteral feeding program. Cancer Res 1987; 47: 3309–3316.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Strasser SI, Shulman HM, McDonald GB . Cholestasis after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Clin Liver Dis 1999; 3: 651–668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fleming CR . Hepatobiliary complications in adults receiving nutrition support. Dig Dis 1994; 12: 191–198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Geibig CB, Ponting Owens J, Mirtallo JM et al. Parenteral nutrition for marrow transplant recipients: evaluation of an increased nitrogen dose. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1991; 15: 184–188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Keller U, Kraenzlin ME, Gratwohl A et al. Protein metabolism assessed by 1-13C leucine infusions in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1990; 14: 480–484.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheney CL, Abson KG, Aker SN et al. Body composition changes in marrow transplant recipients receiving TPN. Cancer 1987; 59: 1515–1519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Figueiredo FA, Dickson ER, Pasha TM et al. Utility of standard nutritional parameters in detecting body cell mass depletion in patients with end-stage liver disease. Liver Transplant 2000; 6: 575–581.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vaz M, Thangam S, Prabhu A et al. Maximal voluntary contraction as a functional indicator of adult chronic undernutrition. Br J Nutr 1996; 76: 9–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Efthimiou J, Fleming J, Gomes C et al. The effect of supplementary oral nutrition in poorly nourished patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988; 137: 1075–1082.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson AM . Low levels of plasma proteins: malnutrition or inflammation? Clin Chem Lab Med 1999; 37: 91–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vanek VW . The use of serum albumin as a prognostic or nutritional marker and the pros and cons of IV albumin therapy. Nutr Clin Pract 1998; 13: 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Boosalis MG, Ott L, Levine AS et al. Relationship of visceral proteins to nutritional status in chronic and acute stress. Crit Care Med 1989; 17: 741–747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Deeg HJ, Seidel K, Bruemmer B et al. Impact of patient weight on non-relapse mortality after marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 461–468.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in surgical patients. The Veterans Affairs Total Parenteral Nutrition Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 525–532.

  29. Buzby GP . Overview of randomized clinical trials of total parenteral nutrition for malnourished surgical patients. World J Surg 1993; 17: 173–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bozzetti F, Gavazzi C, Miceli R et al. Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in malnourished, gastrointestinal cancer patients: a randomized, clinical trial. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2000; 24: 7–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. De Cicco M, Panarello G, Fantin D et al. Parenteral nutrition in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: effects on toxicity and nutritional status. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1993; 17: 513–518.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Charuhas PM, Fosberg KL, Bruemmer B et al. A double-blind randomized trial comparing outpatient parenteral nutrition with intravenous hydration: effect on resumption of oral intake after marrow transplantation. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1997; 21: 157–161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Carlson LE, Koski T, Glück S . Longitudinal effects of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation on quality of life in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 27: 989–998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hann DM, Garovoy N, Finkelstein B et al. Fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: a longitudinal comparative study. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999; 17: 311–319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rock CL, Flatt SW, Newman V et al. Factors associated with weight gain in women after diagnosis of breast cancer. Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study Group. J Am Diet Assoc 1999; 99: 1212–1221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Roberts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, S., Miller, J., Pineiro, L. et al. Total parenteral nutrition vs oral diet in autologous hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 32, 715–721 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704204

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704204

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links