Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Progenitor Cell Mobilisation

Peripheral blood stem cell collection in children with acute leukemia: effectiveness of the ‘DIAVE’ mobilizing regimen

Abstract

Few experiences of peripheral blood (PB) hematopoietic stem cell mobilization for autologous transplantation have been reported to date in children with acute leukemia (AL). The five-drug-chemotherapy ‘DIAVE’ (dexamethazone, idarubicine, cytosine-arabinoside, vincristine, etoposide), followed by G-CSF, previously reported as consolidation, was adopted as a mobilization regimen in 29 children (median age: 8 years, range: 3–21; median weight: 34 kg, range: 15–73) with ALL in second remission (CR2: 21), in CR3 (2) or ANLL in CR1 (6). A median peak of 94 × 106 CD34+cells/l (range: 10–604) was reached at a median time of 12 days (range: 10–18) after the beginning of the mobilizing regimen, which was well tolerated. A median of 10.9 × 106 CD34+cells/kg (range: 2.4–56.6) were collected in 25 patients (86%), approaching 40 × 106/l CD34+ cells in the PB (ALL in CR2: 20/21, in CR3: 0/2; ANLL: 5/6) by means of one (20) or two (5) leukaphereses; a median of 2.5 blood volumes was processed. Patients with ANLL mobilized more cells than patients with ALL; moreover, the shorter the interval between remission and mobilizing therapy, the higher was the yield. The products collected underwent purification, aiming at achieving complete removal of possibly contaminating leukemic cells, in 21 cases; also, unmanipulated aliquots were stored as rescues for all but one patient. All the 23 patients undergoing transplantation engrafted (ANC >0.5 × 109/l) at a median of 12 days. In conclusion, the DIAVE regimen compares favorably with conventional mobilizing regimens, usually containing cyclophosphamide, in terms of low toxicity, collection time predictability, and efficacy, as shown by the high proportion of patients mobilizing, the large amounts of stem cell collected by means of one or two leukaphereses only, and the prompt engraftment after infusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chessels JM . Relapsed lymphoblastic leukemia in children: a continuing challenge Br J Haematol 1998 102: 423 438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Uderzo C, Conter V, Dini G et al. Treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia after the first relapse: curative strategies Haematologica 2001 86: 1 7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burnett AK, Goldstone AH, Stevens RM et al. Randomised comparison of addition of autologous bone-marrow transplantation to intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia in first remission: results of MRC AML 10 trial. UK Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties Lancet 1998 351: 700 708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weisdorf DJ, Billet AL, Hannan P et al. Autologous versus unrelated donor allogeneic marrow transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia Blood 1997 90: 2962 2968

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Borgmann A, Schmid H, Hartmann R et al for the Berlin–Frankfurt–Munster Study Group. Autologous bone-marrow transplants compared with chemotherapy for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a second remission: a matched pair analysis Lancet 1995 346: 873 876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenfeld CS, Shadduk RK, Zeigler ZR et al. Cyclophosphamide-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells in patients with lymphoid malignancies Bone Marrow Transplant 1995 15: 433 438

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart DA, Guo D, Morris D et al. Superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization from dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin plus G-CSF than from less intensive chemotherapy regimens Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 23: 111 117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maldonado MS, Díaz-Heredia C, Badell I et al. from the Spanish Working Party for BMT in Children. Autologous bone marrow transplantation with monoclonal antibody purged marrow for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second remission Bone Marrow Transplant 1998 22: 1043 1047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Balduzzi A, Gaipa G, Bonanomi S et al. Purified autologous grafting in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second remission: evidence for long-term clinical and molecular remission Leukemia 2001 15: 50 56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Petris MG, De Silvestro G, Cesaro S et al. Peripheral blood stem cell collection and transplantation in pediatric malignancies: a monocentric experience Bone Marrow Transplant 1998 22: S13 S15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diaz MA, Kanold J, Vicent MG et al. Using peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) for transplantation in pediatric patients: a state-of-the-art review Bone Marrow Transplant 2000 26: 1291 1298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bassan R, Di Bona E, Rohatiner A et al. for the ALL 07/93 Group. Communication at the Acute Leukemias IX – Basic Research, Experimental Approaches and Novel Therapies Meeting Munich, Germany 2001

    Google Scholar 

  13. To LB, Haylock DN, Simmons PJ, Juttner CA . The biology and clinical use of blood stem cells Blood 1997 89: 2233 2258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gorin NC . Collection, manipulation and freezing of haemopoietic stem cells Clin Haematol 1986 15: 19 48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takaue Y, Kawano Y, Abe T et al. Collection and transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells in very small children weighing 20 kg or less Blood 1995 86: 372 380

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rowley SD, Bensinger WI, Gooley TA, Buckner CD . Effect of cell concentration on bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell cryopreservation Blood 1994 83: 2731 2736

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perseghin P, Epis R, Viganò M et al. Satisfactory recovery and viability of stem cells cryopreserved at high cell concentration Transfusion Sci 1997 18: 399 403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vantelon JM, Koscielny S, Brault P et al. Scoring system for the prediction of successful peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): a application in clinical practice Bone Marrow Transplant 2000 25: 495 499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Figuerres E, Haut PR, Olzewski M, Kletzel M . Analysis of parameters affecting engraftment in children undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation Bone Marrow Transplant 1998 25: 583 588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Webb LJ, Eickhoff CE, Elias AD et al. Kinetics of peripheral blood mononuclear cell mobilization with chemotherapy and/or granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: implications for timing and yield of hematopoietic progenitor cell collections Transfusion 1996 36: 160 167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the ‘Comitato Maria Letizia Verga per lo studio e la cura della leucemia del bambino’ and the ‘Fondazione Tettamanti’ for their continuous support and Miss Sara Vaghi for secretarial assistance. This work was partially supported by grants from the Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) and Ministero Università Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (MURST) (to AB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balduzzi, A., Perseghin, P., Dassi, M. et al. Peripheral blood stem cell collection in children with acute leukemia: effectiveness of the ‘DIAVE’ mobilizing regimen. Bone Marrow Transplant 30, 413–416 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703685

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703685

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links