Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Peripheral Blood Stem Cells

Cobe Spectra is superior to Fenwal CS 3000 Plus for collection of hematopoietic stem cells

Abstract

One hundred and seventy-seven stem cell apheresis procedures performed on 91 patients using the Fenwal CS 3000 Plus cell separator and 61 procedures performed on 37 patients using the Cobe Spectra cell separator were studied to compare the CD34+ cell collection efficiencies (CE; the proportion of the total CD34+ cell content in the blood volumes processed that is harvested) of the two machines. The absolute peripheral blood CD34+ cell count was comparable for the two groups (P = 0.27). A strong correlation was seen between the blood CD34+ cell count and the total number of CD34+ cells collected for the Spectra (r2 = 0.59; P < 10−6) and for the CS 3000 Plus (r2 = 0.60; P < 10−6). No significant correlation emerged between the peripheral blood CD34+ cell count and the CE of either machine. The total number of CD34+ cells collected per procedure was comparable (P = 0.51): median 113 × 106 for CS 3000 Plus and median 218 × 106for Spectra. CE was significantly higher with the Spectra (median 45.7%, range 9.8–98.6%) than the CS 3000 Plus (median 30.3%, range 1.7–89.3%; P < 0.00001). We conclude that the CD34+ cell CE of the Spectra is superior to that of the CS 3000 Plus. Therefore, under the usual clinical conditions, Cobe Spectra should be used preferentially for peripheral blood progentor cell collection to maximize the number of hematopoietic stem cells collected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmitz N, Linch DC, Dreger P et al. Randomised trial of filgrastim-mobilised peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation versus autologous bone-marrow transplantation in lymphoma patients (published erratum appears in Lancet 1996; 347: 914) Lancet 1996 347: 353 357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Powles R, Mehta J, Kulkarni S et al. Allogeneic blood and bone-marrow stem-cell transplantation in haematological malignant diseases: a randomised trial Lancet 2000 355: 1231 1237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Singhal S, Powles R, Treleaven J et al. A low CD34+ cell dose results in higher mortality and poorer survival after blood or marrow stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical siblings: should 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg be considered the minimum threshold? Bone Marrow Transplant 2000 26: 489 496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bensinger WI, Martin PJ, Storer B et al. Transplantation of bone marrow as compared with peripheral-blood cells from HLA-identical relatives in patients with hematologic cancers New Engl J Med 2001 344: 175 181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ketterer N, Salles G, Raba M et al. High CD34(+) cell counts decrease hematologic toxicity of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation Blood 1998 91: 3148 3155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ford CD, Pace N, Lehman C . Factors affecting the efficiency of collection of CD34-positive peripheral blood cells by a blood cell separator Transfusion 1998 38: 1046 1050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mehta J, Oyama Y, Winter J et al. CD34+ cell collection efficiency does not correlate with the pre-leukapheresis hematocrit Bone Marrow Transplant 2001 28: 597 601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stroncek DF, Clay ME, Smith J et al. Comparison of two blood cell separators in collecting peripheral blood stem cell components Transfus Med 1997 7: 95 99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schreiner T, Wiesneth M, Krug E et al. Collection of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells by two protocols on an apheresis system Transfusion 1998 38: 1051 1055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Snyder EL, Baril L, Cooper DL et al. In vitro collection and posttransfusion engraftment characteristics of MNCs obtained by using a new separator for autologous PBPC transplantation Transfusion 2000 40: 961 967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heuft HG, Dubiel M, Rick O et al. Inverse relationship between patient peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and collection efficiency for CD34+ cells in two automated leukapheresis systems Transfusion 2001 41: 1008 1013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mehta J, Powles R, Treleaven J et al. Prospective, concurrent comparison of the Cobe Spectra and Haemonetics MCS-3P cell separators for leukapheresis after high-dose filgrastim in patients with hematologic malignancies J Clin Apheresis 1997 12: 63 67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin JS, Burgstaler EA, Pineda AA et al. Effects of whole blood flow rates on mononuclear cell yields during peripheral blood stem cell collection using Fenwal CS 3000 Plus (published erratum appears in J Clin Apheresis 1995; 10: 107) J Clin Apheresis 1995 10: 7 11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M et al. The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering J Hematother 1996 5: 213 226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Auxiliary Board of the Northwestern Memorial Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehta, J., Singhal, S., Gordon, L. et al. Cobe Spectra is superior to Fenwal CS 3000 Plus for collection of hematopoietic stem cells. Bone Marrow Transplant 29, 563–567 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703520

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703520

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links