Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Viral Infections

Monitoring of cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: comparison of an antigenemia assay and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were compared for monitoring of CMV reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The number of CMV antigen-positive cells by the antigenemia assay and the level of CMV DNA by real-time PCR correlated well. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigenemia assay was 55.4% and 95.5%, respectively, using real-time PCR as the reference standard. The probability of positive antigenemia at day 100 was 76.5%, with a median of first detection at day 37 in 51 patients, compared with a positive PCR of 84.3% and day 33, respectively. When HLA-identical sibling donor transplant recipients and other donor transplant recipients were analyzed separately, there was no difference between the two tests. However, temporal patterns of first detection of CMV antigen-positive cells and CMV DNA differed between HLA-identical and alternative recipients; patients without CMV (29%) or with sporadic positive PCR results (14%) were more common in HLA-identical sibling transplants, whereas patients with simultaneous antigenemia and positive PCR occurred more in alternative transplants (48%). Two of 51 patients (4%) developed CMV colitis despite antigenemia-guided prophylaxis, but both were successfully treated with ganciclovir. Although PCR is more sensitive than antigenemia, both tests are useful in the early detection of CMV after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zaia JA . Cytomegalovirus infection. In: Thomas ED, Blume KG, Forman SJ (eds) Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Blackwell Science: Malden 1999 560 583

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boeckh M, Gooley TA, Myerson D et al. Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia- guided early treatment with ganciclovir versus ganciclovir at engraftment after allogeneic marrow transplantation: a randomized double-blind study Blood 1996 88: 4063 4071

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Bij W, Torensma R, van Son WJ et al. Rapid immunodiagnosis of active cytomegalovirus infection by monoclonal antibody staining of blood leucocytes J Med Virol 1988 25: 179 188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The TH, van der Bij W, van der Berg AP et al. Cytomegalovirus antigenemia Rev Infect Dis 1990 12: (suppl. 7) S737 S744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boeckh M, Bowden RA, Goodrich JM et al. Cytomegalovirus antigen detection in peripheral blood leukocytes after allogeneic marrow transplantation Blood 1992 80: 1358 1364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gondo H, Minematsu T, Harada M et a. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenaemia for rapid diagnosis and monitoring of CMV-associated disease after bone marrow transplantation Br J Haematol 1994 86: 130 137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takenaka K, Gondo H, Tanimoto K et al. Increased incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and CMV-associated disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors Bone Marrow Transplant 1997 19: 241 248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanda Y, Mineishi S, Saito T et al. Pre-emptive therapy against cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease guided by CMV antigenemia assay after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience in Japan Bone Marrow Transplant 2001 21: 437 444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Einsele H, Ehninger G, Hebart H et al. Polymerase chain reaction monitoring reduces the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease and the duration and side effects of antiviral therapy after bone marrow transplantation Blood 1995 86: 2815 2820

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gozlan J, Laporte JP, Lesage S et al. Monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in bone marrow recipients by reverse transcription-PCR and comparison with PCR and blood and urine cultures J Clin Microbiol 1996 34: 2085 2088

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hebart H, Muller C, Loffler J et al. Monitoring of CMV infection: a comparison of PCR from whole blood, plasma-PCR, pp65-antigenemia and virus culture in patients after bone marrow transplantation Bone Marrow Transplant 1996 17: 861 868

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boeckh M, Gallez-Hawkins GM, Myerson D et al. Plasma polymerase chain reaction for cytomegalovirus DNA after allogeneic marrow transplantation Transplantation 1997 64: 108 113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ljungman P, Aschan J, Lewensohn-Fuchs I et al. Results of different strategies for reducing cytomegalovirus-associated mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients Transplantation 1998 66: 1330 1334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ljungman P, Lore K, Aschan J et al. Use of a semi-quantitative PCR for cytomegalovirus DNA as a basis for pre-emptive antiviral therapy in allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients Bone Marrow Transplant 1996 17: 583 587

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanda Y, Chiba S, Suzuki T et al. Time course analysis of semi-quantitative PCR and antigenaemia assay for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after bone marrow transplantation Br J Haematol 1998 100: 222 225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Caliendo AM, St George K, Kao S et al. Comparison of quantitative cytomegalovirus (CMV) PCR in plasma and CMV antigenemia assay: clinical utility of the prototype Amplicor CMV Monitor test in transplant recipients J Clin Microbiol 2000 38: 2122 2127

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Emery VC, Sabin CA, Cope AV et al. Application of viral-load kinetics to identify patients who develop cytomegalovirus disease after transplantation Lancet 2000 355: 2032 2036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Machida U, Kami M, Fukui T et al. Real-time automated PCR for early diagnosis and monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection after bone marrow transplantation J Clin Microbiol 2000 38: 2536 2542

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas ED, Storb R, Clift RA et al. Bone marrow transplantation New Engl J Med 1975 292: 895 902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gondo H, Harada M, Taniguchi S et al. Cyclosporine combined with methylprednisolone or methotrexate in prophylaxis of moderate to severe acute graft-versus-host disease Bone Marrow Transplant 1993 12: 437 441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ljungman P, Griffiths P . Definitions of cytomegalovirus infection and disease. In: Michelson S, Plotkin SA (eds) Multidisciplinary Approach to Understanding Cytomegalovirus Disease Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam 1993 233 237

    Google Scholar 

  22. Limaye AP, Huang ML, Leisenring W et al. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA load in plasma for the diagnosis of CMV disease before engraftment in hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients J Infect Dis 2001 183: 377 382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gerna G, Baldanti F, Lilleri D et al. Human cytomegalovirus immediate–early mRNA detection by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification as a new parameter for pre-emptive therapy in bone marrow transplant recipients J Clin Microbiol 2000 38: 1845 1853

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cwynarski K, Ainsworth J, Cobbold M et al. Direct visualization of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell reconstitution after allogeneic stem cell transplantation Blood 2001 97: 1232 1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boeckh M, Bowden RA, Gooley T et al. Successful modification of a pp65 antigenemia-based early treatment strategy for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in allogeneic marrow transplant recipients Blood 1999 93: 1781 1782

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Verdonck LF, Dekker AW, Rozenberg-Arska M, van den Hoek MR . A risk-adapted approach with a short course of ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonia in CMV-seropositive recipients of allogeneic bone marrow transplants Clin Infect Dis 1997 24: 901 907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Manteiga R, Martino R, Sureda A et al. Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia- guided pre-emptive treatment with ganciclovir after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience Bone Marrow Transplant 1998 22: 899 904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mori T, Okamoto S, Matsuoka S et al. Risk-adapted pre-emptive therapy for cytomegalovirus disease in patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation Bone Marrow Transplant 2000 25: 765 769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Michel D, Marre E, Hampl W et al. Intestinal cytomegalovirus disease in immunocompromised patients may be ruled out by search for cytomegalovirus DNA in stool samples J Clin Microbiol 1995 33: 3064 3067

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yakushiji, K., Gondo, H., Kamezaki, K. et al. Monitoring of cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: comparison of an antigenemia assay and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Bone Marrow Transplant 29, 599–606 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703513

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703513

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links