Randomized trial of peripheral blood progenitor cell vs bone marrow as hematopoietic support for high-dose chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease: a clinical and molecular analysis

Abstract

Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and unstimulated bone marrow (BM) were evaluated and compared for reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed Hodgkin’s disease (HD) or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) with respect to engraftment, overall and relapse-free survival, and contamination by lymphoma cells using molecular analysis of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements. Forty-four patients with either NHL or HD underwent autologous transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either Filgrastim-mobilized PBPC (n = 15) or unstimulated BM (n = 14). An additional 15 patients received PBPC without randomization because of a recent history of marrow involvement by lymphoma. Use of PBPC was associated with faster neutrophil engraftment than BM (11 vs 14 days to an absolute neutrophil count >0.5 × 10⁹/l, P = 0.04), but without any difference in platelet engraftment, infectious complications, or overall or event-free survival. Both BM (65%) and PBPC (73%) were frequently contaminated by tumor cells as assessed by CDR3 analysis. Patients with negative polymerase chain reaction analysis of a BM sample during the study had a trend towards an improved survival; however, BM involvement by disease had no impact on the ability to mobilize or collect PBPC. We conclude that PBPC are as effective as BM in reconstituting hematopoiesis after high-dose chemotherapy and that both products are frequently contaminated by sequences marking the malignant clone.